Optimizing radiosurgery with photons for ocular melanoma

Abstract

Background and purpose: Photon radiotherapy has been established for the treatment of ocular melanoma (OM). Here we investigate the planning qualities of two different planning approaches, a combination of dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) complemented with multiple non-coplanar static intensity-modulated (IMRT) fields (DCA-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in combination with automated planning (AP). Materials and methods: Thirteen consecutive patients treated for ocular melanoma with curative intent on a Linac-based radiosurgery system were analyzed. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) was applied using 50 Gy in 5 fractions using the combination of DCA-IMRT. Plans were reviewed and the thirteen cases were compared to plans obtained with optimized automated VMAT based on a set of 28 distinct patients treated with DCA-IMRT who were selected to generate the AP model for the prediction of dose volume constraints. Results: Overall, plan quality of DCA-IMRT was superior to AP with VMAT. PTV coverage did not exceed 107% in any case treated with DCA-IMRT, compared to seven patients with VMAT. The median PTV covered by >95% was 98.3% (91.9%–99.7%) with DCA-IMRT, compared to 95.1% (91.5%–97.9%) (p < 0.01) with VMAT. The median mean dose delivered to the treated eye was 22.4 Gy (12.3 Gy–33.3 Gy) with DCA-IMRT compared to 27.2 Gy (15.5 Gy–33.7 Gy) (p < 0.01). Dose to the ipsilateral lacrimal gland and the ipsilateral optic nerve were comparable for DCA-IMRT and VMAT, however, the dose to the lens was lower with DCA-IMRT compared to VMAT. Conclusions: The combination of multiple arcs complemented with multiple IMRT fields sets the gold standard for fSRS of ocular melanoma for photon therapy. Keywords: Melanoma, Uveal melanoma, Choroidal melanoma, Ocular melanoma, Stereotactic, Radiosurgery, SBRT, IMRT, VMAT, HybridArc, Automated planning