Environmental Sciences Proceedings (Dec 2023)

Simulation of DEM Based on ICESat-2 Data Using Openly Accessible Topographic Datasets

  • Shruti Pancholi,
  • A. Abhinav,
  • Sandeep Maithani,
  • Ashutosh Bhardwaj

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ECRS2023-16189
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 1
p. 66

Abstract

Read online

The digital elevation model (DEM) is a three-dimensional digital representation of the terrain or the Earth’s surface. For determining topography, DEMs are the most used and ideal method with (i.e., the digital surface model) or without the objects (i.e., the digital terrain model). Various techniques are used to create DEMs, including traditional surveying methods, photogrammetry, InSAR, lidar, clinometry, and radargrammetry. DEMs generated by LiDAR tend to be the most accurate except for the VHR datasets acquired from UAVs with spatial resolution of a few centimeters. In many parts of the region, LiDAR data are not available, which limits researchers’ access to high-resolution and accurate DEMs. With a beam footprint of 13 m and a pulse interval of 0.7 m, ICESat-2 promises high orbital precision and high accuracy. ICESat-2 can produce high-accuracy DEMs in complex topographies with an accuracy of a few centimeters. The Earth’s surface elevations are provided by discrete photon data from ICESat-2. It is difficult to justify the continuity of the topographical data using traditional interpolation techniques since they over-smooth the estimated space. Geospatial data can be analyzed with machine learning algorithms to extract patterns and spatial extents. To estimate a DEM from LiDAR point data from ICESat-2 using CartoDEM, machine learning regression algorithms are used in this study V3 R1. This study was conducted over a hilly terrain of the Dehradun region in the foothills of the Himalayas in India. The applicability and robustness of these algorithms has been tested for a plain region of Ghaziabad, India, in an earlier study. The interpolation of DEM from ICESat-2 data was analyzed using regression-based machine learning techniques. Interpolated DEMs were evaluated against the TANDEM-X DEM of the same region with RMSEs of 7.13 m, 7.01 m, 7.15 m, and 3.76 m respectively, using gradient boosting regressors, random forest regressors, decision tree regressors, and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) regressors. Based on the four algorithms tested, the MLP regressor shows the best performance in the previous study. The accuracy of the simulated ICESat-2 DEM using the MLP regressor was assessed in this study using the DGPS points over the Dehradun region. The RMSE was of the order of 6.58 m for the DGPS reference data.

Keywords