Animals (Jun 2012)

Extending the Collection Duration of Breath Samples for Enteric Methane Emission Estimation Using the SF<sub>6</sub> Tracer Technique

  • John Koolaard,
  • Grant Taylor,
  • German Molano,
  • Sarah MacLean,
  • Edgar Sandoval,
  • Roberto Gratton,
  • Paula Juliarena,
  • César Pinares-Patiño,
  • José Gere,
  • Karen Williams

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani2020275
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 2
pp. 275 – 287

Abstract

Read online

The daily sample collection protocol of the sulphur hexafluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>) tracer technique for the estimation of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from ruminants may not be practical under extensive grazing systems. Here, under controlled conditions, we evaluated extended periods of sampling as an alternative to daily sample collections. Eight rumen-fistulated cows were housed and fed lucerne silage to achieve common daily feed intakes of 6.4 kg dry matter per cow. Following SF<sub>6</sub> permeation tube dosing, eight sampling lines were fitted to the breath collection harness, so that a common gas mix was available to each line. Half of the lines collected samples into PVC yokes using a modified capillary system as commonly used in New Zealand (NZL), and half collected samples into stainless steel cylinders using a ball-bearing flow restrictor as used in Argentina (ARG), all within a 10-day time frame, either daily, across two consecutive 5-day periods or across one 10-day period (in duplicate). The NZL system had greater sampling success (97.3 <em>vs.</em> 79.5%) and yielded more consistent CH<sub>4</sub> emission estimates than the ARG system. Emission estimates from NZL daily, NZL 5-day and NZL 10-day samplings were 114, 110 and 111 g d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Extended sample collection protocol may be feasible, but definitive evaluation of this alternative as well as sample collection systems is required under grazing situations before a decision on recommendation can be made.

Keywords