Scientific Reports (Dec 2022)

In vitro characterization of immune modulating drug-eluting immunobeads towards transarterial embolization in cancer

  • Ayele H. Negussie,
  • Andrew S. Mikhail,
  • Joshua W. Owen,
  • Natalie Hong,
  • Camella J. Carlson,
  • Yiqing Tang,
  • Kendal Paige Carrow,
  • Michal Mauda-Havakuk,
  • Andrew L. Lewis,
  • John W. Karanian,
  • William F. Pritchard,
  • Bradford J. Wood

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26094-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive liver cancer with limited effective treatment options. In this study, we selected TLR agonists imiquimod (IMQ), gardiquimod (GARD), GS-9620 and DSR 6434, and a small molecule checkpoint inhibitor, BMS-202, for characterization of drug loading and release from radiopaque embolic beads (DC Bead LUMI) for potential use in image-guided transarterial embolization (TACE) of HCC. The maximum drug loading capacity and amount of drug released over time were determined by high performance liquid chromatography and compared with the commonly used anthracycline, doxorubicin hydrochloride (Dox). Maximum drug loading was 204.54 ± 3.87, 65.97 ± 1.54, 65.95 ± 6.96, 65.28 ± 3.09, and 148.05 ± 2.24 mg of drug per milliliter of DC Bead LUMI for Dox, GARD, DSR 6434, IMQ, and BMS-202, respectively. Fast loading and subsequent rapid release in saline were observed for IMQ, GARD, and DSR 6434. These drugs could also be partially removed from the beads by repeated washing with de-ionized water suggesting weak interaction with the beads. Aggregation of IMQ was observed in water and saline. GS-9620 partially decomposed in the solubilizing solution, so loading and release were not characterized. Compared to TLR agonists, slower loading and release were observed for Dox and BMS-202. Potential factors influencing drug loading into and release from DC Bead LUMI including steric hinderance, hydrophobicity, drug pKa, and the electrostatic nature of the beads are discussed. The maximum loading capacity of BMS-202 and Dox in DC Bead LUMI exceeded the maximum theoretical loading capacity of the beads expected from ionic interaction alone suggesting additional drug-bead or drug-drug interactions may play a role. Slightly more release was observed for BMS-202 at early time points followed by a slower release compared to Dox. Further study of these drug-bead combinations is warranted in search of new tools for locoregional delivery of immune-modulating agents for treatment of HCC via drug-eluting bead chemoembolization.