Тазовая хирургия и онкология (Feb 2015)

CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION

  • S. G. Tereshchenko,
  • E. V. Velikanov,
  • E. M. Lukina,
  • A. A. Titaeva,
  • L. V. Mechеva

DOI
https://doi.org/10.17650/2220-3478-2013-0-3-56-62
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 0, no. 3
pp. 56 – 62

Abstract

Read online

Bowel preparation remains an important issue despite vast clinical experience in this field.Methods. 530 patients were included in retrospective analysis. 234 (44.2 %) patients in group 1 used sodium phosphate (SP) for bowel preparation, 176 (33.2 %) patients in group 2 used polyethylene glycol (PEG), 120 (22.6 %) patients used castor oil. Quality of bowel preparation was assessed according to following grading system: «good», «acceptable», «bad».Results. «Good», «acceptable», «bad» bowel preparation was observed in following number of patients: 160 (68.4 %), 46 (19.7 %) and 28 (12 %) patients who used SP, 38.6, 40.3 and 20.1 % who used PEG and 43.3, 20.8, 35.8 % who used castor oil. Results of «good» preparation were significantly better in patients who used SP comparing to other treatment groups.Conclusions. Better bowel preparation with SP was observed in our study, though results need to be validated in randomized trials.

Keywords