Environmental Research Letters (Jan 2020)

Inconsistencies in sulfur dioxide emissions from the Canadian oil sands and potential implications

  • Chris A McLinden,
  • Cristen L F Adams,
  • Vitali Fioletov,
  • Debora Griffin,
  • Paul A Makar,
  • Xiaoyi Zhao,
  • Andrew Kovachik,
  • Nolan Dickson,
  • Cassandra Brown,
  • Nicolay Krotkov,
  • Can Li,
  • Nicolas Theys,
  • Pascal Hedelt,
  • Diego G Loyola

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abcbbb
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
p. 014012

Abstract

Read online

Satellite-derived and reported sulfur dioxide (SO _2 ) emissions from the Canadian oil sands are shown to have been consistent up to 2013. Post-2013, these sources of emissions data diverged, with reported emissions dropping by a factor of two, while satellite-derived emissions for the region remained relatively constant, with the discrepancy (satellite-derived emissions minus reported emissions) peaking at 50 kt(SO _2 ) yr ^−1 around 2016. The 2013–2014 period corresponds to when new flue-gas desulfurization units came on-line. Previous work has established a high level of consistency between at-stack SO _2 emissions observations and satellite estimates, and surface monitoring network SO _2 concentrations over the same multi-year period show similar trends as the satellite data, with a slight increase in concentrations post-2013. No clear explanation for this discrepancy currently exists. The implications of the discrepancy towards estimated total sulfur deposition to downwind ecosystems were estimated relative to 2013 emissions levels, with the satellite-derived values leaving the area of regional critical load exceedances of aquatic ecosystems largely unchanged from 2013 values, 335 000 km ^2 , and reported values potentially decreasing this area to 185 000 km ^2 .

Keywords