Current Oncology (Aug 2024)

Comparison of Weekly Paclitaxel Regimens in Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: A Single Institution Retrospective Study

  • Laurence Morin,
  • Louis-Philippe Grenier,
  • Nicolas Foucault,
  • Éric Lévesque,
  • François Fabi,
  • Eve-Lyne Langlais,
  • Alexandra Sebastianelli,
  • Marianne Lavoie,
  • Marc Lalancette,
  • Marie Plante,
  • Mahukpe Narcisse Ulrich Singbo,
  • Vincent Castonguay

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080345
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 31, no. 8
pp. 4624 – 4631

Abstract

Read online

Weekly paclitaxel (WP) is a chemotherapeutic cornerstone in the management of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma. Multiple WP dosing regimens have been used clinically and studied individually. However, no formal comparison of these regimens is available to provide objective guidance in clinical decision making. The primary objective of this study was to compare the cumulative dose of paclitaxel delivered using 80 mg/m2/week, administered using either a 3 weeks out of 4 (WP3) or a 4 weeks out of 4 (WP4) regimen. The secondary objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with both regimens, including efficacy and toxicity parameters. Our retrospective cohort comprised 149 patients harboring platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated at the CHU de Québec from January 2012 to January 2023. WP3 and WP4 reached a similar cumulative dose (1353.7 vs. 1404.2 mg/m2; p = 0.29). No significant differences in the clinical outcomes were observed. The frequency of dose reduction was significantly higher for WP4 than WP3 (44.7% vs. 4.9%; p p < 0.01). Our data suggest that a WP3 regimen delivers a similar cumulative dose to WP4, hence offering a better tolerability profile without compromising efficacy.

Keywords