PLoS ONE (Jan 2013)

Cost-effectiveness comparison of Genechip and conventional drug susceptibility test for detecting multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in China.

  • Yu Pang,
  • Qiang Li,
  • Xichao Ou,
  • Hojoon Sohn,
  • Zhiying Zhang,
  • Junchen Li,
  • Hui Xia,
  • Kai Man Kam,
  • Richard J O'Brien,
  • Junying Chi,
  • Shitong Huan,
  • Daniel P Chin,
  • Yan-lin Zhao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069267
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 7
p. e69267

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND: Genechip (CapitalBio, Beijing, China) is a system for diagnosing resistance to rifampin and isoniazid, which shows high efficiency in detecting drug-resistant tuberculosis. Here, we firstly evaluated the costs of Genechip for detecting the drug susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, compared to conventional drug susceptibility test (DST) in laboratories in China. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Data on the costs of the two tests were collected at four hospitals. Costs were calculated using the essential factor cost calculation method. The costs of diagnosing a single case of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) using Genechip and DST were US$22.38 and $53.03, respectively. Taking into account the effect on costs from failure of a certain number of tests to accurately diagnose MDR-TB, the costs of Genechip and DST increased by 17.65% and 5.22%, respectively. The cost of both tests decreased with the increasing prevalence of MDR-TB disease, and the cost of Genechip at a sensitivity of more than 50% was lower than that of DST. When price of Genechip was varied to 50%, 80%, 150%, and 200% of the original price, the cost of Genechip at sensitivities of more than 30%, 40%, 60%, and 70%, respectively, was also lower than that of DST. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed that Genechip was a more cost-effective method of diagnosing MDR-TB compared to conventional DST.