Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies (Dec 2023)

Groundwater level forecasting in a data-scarce region through remote sensing data downscaling, hydrological modeling, and machine learning: A case study from Morocco

  • Abdellatif Rafik,
  • Yassine Ait Brahim,
  • Abdelhakim Amazirh,
  • Mohamed Ouarani,
  • Bouchra Bargam,
  • Hamza Ouatiki,
  • Yassine Bouslihim,
  • Lhoussaine Bouchaou,
  • Abdelghani Chehbouni

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 50
p. 101569

Abstract

Read online

Study region: The upstream part of the Essaouira basin, a data-scare region in Morocco, Northwestern Africa. Study focus: The scarcity of hydro-climate data is a significant challenge found in several regions worldwide, where qualitative and quantitative water resource information remains limited. Estimating and predicting groundwater levels (GWL) in such areas is a significant challenge in producing knowledge for effective water resource management. To address this issue, the present study aimed to use the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model in conjunction with downscaled total water storage (TWS) data (9 km) obtained from Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) and machine learning techniques, specifically random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM), to estimate and predict the variation in GWL. New hydrological insights for the region: This study constitutes a first of its kind in the study area; the SWAT model was set up for 10 years, with a warm-up period from 2000 to 2001, calibration from 2002 to 2007, and validation from 2008 to 2010. The statistical indices (Coefficient of Determination (R²) ≥ 0.73, R² ≥ 0.78, Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NSE) ≥ 0.67, NSE ≥ 0.80 respectively for calibration and validation) highlight a significant correlation, implying the model's capability to faithfully reproduce the streamflow. The downscaled TWS demonstrates an impressive ability to identify and monitor fluctuations in GWL. Using machine learning algorithms (RF and SVR), the prediction of GWL yielded satisfactory results, NSE = 0.78 and root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.33, NSE = 0.51 and RMSE = 0.49 for the RF and SVR, respectively. Despite some limitations, our approach provided promising results in GWL prediction, with the possibility of expanding to other data-scarce regions.

Keywords