Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Introduction Lung cancer continues to be a common form of cancer worldwide and a primary contributor to cancer-related fatalities. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent form, making up 80% to 85% of newly identified malignant lung tumours, and remains a major concern for worldwide health. Surgical resection is the preferred treatment for localised NSCLC, but more than one-third of patients present with locally advanced, unresectable tumours. Concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy are believed to offer the potential for prolonged disease-free and overall survival to those patients. However, the results are inconsistent, and systematic meta-analysis is lacking to evaluate its treatment effect comprehensively. Therefore, we will conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3D-CRT concurrent chemotherapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC to provide evidence-based medical support for clinical treatment.Methods and analysis This systematic review and meta-analysis will adhere to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA statement. Based on the predetermined criteria for inclusion, we will conduct a comprehensive search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) concurrent chemotherapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC. The search will be performed across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to 1 November 2024 using terms including NSCLC, 3D-CRT concurrent chemotherapy, radiation therapy, RCT and controlled clinical trial. Furthermore, relevant literature citations will be gathered, and relevant journals will be manually searched. The primary outcomes in the study were overall survival; progression-free survival; 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates; event-free survival; and median survival time. Secondary outcomes included treatment effectiveness, all adverse events (AEs), all treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), AEs (grade ≥3) and TRAEs (grade ≥3). Two separate reviewers will be responsible for screening, extracting data and evaluating quality. Our reviewers will perform subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis to evaluate the heterogeneity and robustness. Review Manager 5.4 will be used for the analysis and synthesis process. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2), and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be employed to evaluate the study’s overall evidence quality.Ethics and dissemination This study is based on a secondary analysis of the literature, so ethical review approval is not required. The final report will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration The protocol of the systematic review has been registered on Open Science Framework, with a registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R7WCG.