BMC Psychiatry (Jul 2017)

Assessment of eating disorders with the diabetes eating problems survey – revised (DEPS-R) in a representative sample of insulin-treated diabetic patients: a validation study in Italy

  • Federica Pinna,
  • Enrica Diana,
  • Lucia Sanna,
  • Valeria Deiana,
  • Mirko Manchia,
  • Eraldo Nicotra,
  • Andrea Fiorillo,
  • Umberto Albert,
  • Alessandra Nivoli,
  • Umberto Volpe,
  • Anna Rita Atti,
  • Silvia Ferrari,
  • Federica Medda,
  • Maria Gloria Atzeni,
  • Daniela Manca,
  • Elisa Mascia,
  • Fernando Farci,
  • Mariangela Ghiani,
  • Rossella Cau,
  • Marta Tuveri,
  • Efisio Cossu,
  • Elena Loy,
  • Alessandra Mereu,
  • Stefano Mariotti,
  • Bernardo Carpiniello

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1434-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The purpose of the study was to evaluate in a sample of insulin-treated diabetic patients, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version of the DEPS-R scale, a diabetes-specific self-report questionnaire used to analyze disordered eating behaviors. Methods The study was performed on 211 consecutive insulin-treated diabetic patients attending two specialist centers. Lifetime prevalence of eating disorders (EDs) according to DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria were assessed by means of the Module H of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis I Disorder and the Module H modified, according to DSM-5 criteria. The following questionnaires were administered: DEPS-R and the Eating Disorder Inventory – 3 (EDI-3). Test/retest reproducibility was assessed on a subgroup of 70 patients. The factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of DEPS-R were assessed. Results Overall, 21.8% of the sample met criteria for at least one DSM-5 diagnosis of ED. A “clinical risk” of ED was observed in 13.3% of the sample. Females displayed higher scores at DEPS-R, a higher percentage of at least one diagnosis of ED and a higher clinical risk for ED. A high level of reproducibility and homogeneity of the scale were revealed. A significant correlation was detected between DEPS-R and the 3 ED risk scales of EDI-3. Conclusions The data confirmed the overall reliability and validity of the scale. In view of the significance and implications of EDs in diabetic patients, it should be conducted a more extensive investigation of the phenomenon by means of evaluation instruments of demonstrated validity and reliability.

Keywords