Frontiers in Medicine (Nov 2021)

Deciphering CHFR Role in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

  • Iranzu González-Borja,
  • Emilia Alors-Pérez,
  • Emilia Alors-Pérez,
  • Emilia Alors-Pérez,
  • Emilia Alors-Pérez,
  • Irene Amat,
  • Laura Alonso,
  • Cristina Viyuela-García,
  • Cristina Viyuela-García,
  • Cristina Viyuela-García,
  • Saioa Goñi,
  • José C. Reyes,
  • María Ceballos-Chávez,
  • Irene Hernández-García,
  • Marina E. Sánchez-Frías,
  • Marina E. Sánchez-Frías,
  • Marina E. Sánchez-Frías,
  • Enrique Santamaría,
  • Socorro Razquin,
  • Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez,
  • Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez,
  • Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez,
  • Virginia Arrazubi,
  • Jairo Pérez-Sanz,
  • Ruth Vera,
  • Joaquín Fernández-Irigoyen,
  • Justo P. Castaño,
  • Justo P. Castaño,
  • Justo P. Castaño,
  • Justo P. Castaño,
  • Antonio Viúdez,
  • Antonio Viúdez,
  • Antonio Viúdez

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.720128
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Checkpoint with forkhead-associated and ring finger domains (CHFR) has been proposed as a predictive and prognosis biomarker for different tumor types, but its role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unknown. The aim of this study was two-pronged: to review the role of CHFR in PDAC and evaluating CHFR as a potential predictive biomarker in this disease. For this purpose, we first explored the CHFR messenger (m)RNA expression and promoter methylation through the TCGA database. Secondly, the CHFR expression and promoter methylation were prospectively evaluated in a cohort of patients diagnosed with borderline (n = 19) or resectable (n = 16) PDAC by immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation specific-PCR (MSP), and pyrosequencing. The results from the TCGA database showed significant differences in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on the CHFR mRNA expression, which was likely independent from the promoter methylation. Importantly, our results showed that in primarily resected patients and also the entire cohort, a higher CHFR expression as indicated by the higher IHC staining intensity might identify patients with longer disease-free survival (DFS) and OS, respectively. Similarly, in the same cohorts, patients with lower methylation levels by pyrosequencing showed significantly longer OS than patients without this pattern. Both, the CHFR expression intensity and its promoter methylation were established as independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS in the entire cohort. In contrast, no significant differences were found between different methylation patterns for CHFR and the response to taxane-based neoadjuvant treatment. These results suggest the potential role of the higher expression of CHFR and the methylation pattern of its promoter as potential prognostic biomarkers in PDAC, thus warranting further comprehensive studies to extend and confirm our preliminary findings.

Keywords