Biomarker Insights (May 2022)

Identification of Potential Urinary Metabolite Biomarkers of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

  • Bart’s Jongers,
  • An Hotterbeekx,
  • Kenny Bielen,
  • Philippe Vervliet,
  • Jan Boddaert,
  • Christine Lammens,
  • Erik Fransen,
  • Geert Baggerman,
  • Adrian Covaci,
  • Herman Goossens,
  • Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar,
  • Philippe G Jorens,
  • Samir Kumar-Singh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11772719221099131
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospital intensive care units (ICU). Rapid identification of P. aeruginosa -derived markers in easily accessible patients’ samples can enable an early detection of P. aeruginosa VAP (VAP-PA), thereby stewarding antibiotic use and improving clinical outcomes. Methods: Metabolites were analysed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in prospectively collected urine samples from mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the Antwerp University Hospital ICU. Patients were followed from the start of mechanical ventilation (n = 100 patients) till the time of clinical diagnosis of VAP (n = 13). Patients (n = 8) in whom diagnosis of VAP was further confirmed by culturing respiratory samples and urine samples were studied for semi-quantitative metabolomics. Results: We first show that multivariate analyses highly discriminated VAP-PA from VAP–non-PA as well as from the pre-infection groups ( R 2 = .97 and .98, respectively). A further univariate analysis identified 58 metabolites that were significantly elevated or uniquely present in VAP-PA compared to the VAP–non-PA and pre-infection groups ( P < .05). These comprised both a known metabolite of histidine as well as a novel nicotine metabolite. Most interestingly, we identified 3 metabolites that were not only highly upregulated for, but were also highly specific to, VAP-PA, as these metabolites were completely absent in all pre-infection timepoints and in VAP–non-PA group. Conclusions: Considerable differences exist between urine metabolites in VAP-PA compared to VAP due to other bacterial aetiologies as well to non-VAP (pre-infection) timepoints. The unique urinary metabolic biomarkers we describe here, if further validated, could serve as highly specific diagnostic biomarkers of VAP-PA.