Frontiers in Pharmacology (Mar 2023)
Differential effects of ELX/TEZ/IVA on organ-specific CFTR function in two patients with the rare CFTR splice mutations c.273+1G>A and c.165-2A>G
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence for the efficiency of highly-effective triple-CFTR-modulatory therapy with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), either demonstrated in clinical trials or by in vitro testing, is lacking for about 10% of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) with rare mutations. Comprehensive assessment of CFTR function can provide critical information on the impact of ETI on CFTR function gains for such rare mutations, lending argument of the prescription of ETI. The mutation c.165-2A>G is a rare acceptor splice mutation that has not yet been functionally characterized. We here describe the functional changes induced by ETI in two brothers who are compound heterozygous for the splice mutations c.273+1G>C and c.165-2A>G.Methods: We assessed the effects of ETI on CFTR function by quantitative pilocarpine iontophoresis (QPIT), nasal potential difference measurements (nPD), intestinal current measurements (ICM), β-adrenergic sweat secretion tests (SST) and multiple breath washout (MBW) prior to and 4 months after the initiation of ETI.Results: Functional CFTR analysis prior to ETI showed no CFTR function in the respiratory and intestinal epithelia and in the sweat gland reabsorptive duct in either brother. In contrast, β-adrenergic stimulated, CFTR-mediated sweat secretion was detectable in the CF range. Under ETI, both brothers continued to exhibit high sweat chloride concentration in QPIT, evidence of low residual CFTR function in the respiratory epithelia, but normalized β-adrenergically stimulated production of primary sweat.Discussion: Our results are the first to demonstrate that the c.165-2A>G/c.273+1G>C mutation genotype permits mutant CFTR protein expression. We showed organ-specific differences in the expression of CFTR and consecutive responses to ETI of the c.165-2A>G/c.273+1G>C CFTR mutants that are probably accomplished by non-canonical CFTR mRNA isoforms. This showcase tells us that the individual response of rare CFTR mutations to highly-effective CFTR modulation cannot be predicted from assays in standard cell cultures, but requires the personalized multi-organ assessment by CFTR biomarkers.
Keywords
