Genome Medicine (May 2021)
Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries
- Richard Milne,
- Katherine I. Morley,
- Mohamed A. Almarri,
- Shamim Anwer,
- Jerome Atutornu,
- Elena E. Baranova,
- Paul Bevan,
- Maria Cerezo,
- Yali Cong,
- Alessia Costa,
- Christine Critchley,
- Josepine Fernow,
- Peter Goodhand,
- Qurratulain Hasan,
- Aiko Hibino,
- Gry Houeland,
- Heidi C. Howard,
- S. Zakir Hussain,
- Charlotta Ingvoldstad Malmgren,
- Vera L. Izhevskaya,
- Aleksandra Jędrzejak,
- Cao Jinhong,
- Megumi Kimura,
- Erika Kleiderman,
- Brandi Leach,
- Keying Liu,
- Deborah Mascalzoni,
- Álvaro Mendes,
- Jusaku Minari,
- Dianne Nicol,
- Emilia Niemiec,
- Christine Patch,
- Jack Pollard,
- Barbara Prainsack,
- Marie Rivière,
- Lauren Robarts,
- Jonathan Roberts,
- Virginia Romano,
- Haytham A. Sheerah,
- James Smith,
- Alexandra Soulier,
- Claire Steed,
- Vigdis Stefànsdóttir,
- Cornelia Tandre,
- Adrian Thorogood,
- Torsten H. Voigt,
- Nan Wang,
- Anne V. West,
- Go Yoshizawa,
- Anna Middleton
Affiliations
- Richard Milne
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science
- Katherine I. Morley
- RAND Europe
- Mohamed A. Almarri
- Wellcome Sanger Institute
- Shamim Anwer
- Keynote IAS
- Jerome Atutornu
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science
- Elena E. Baranova
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- Paul Bevan
- Wellcome Sanger Institute
- Maria Cerezo
- EMBL-EBI
- Yali Cong
- Medical Ethics Program, Peking University Health Science Center
- Alessia Costa
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science
- Christine Critchley
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology
- Josepine Fernow
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University
- Peter Goodhand
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, MaRS Centre
- Qurratulain Hasan
- Department of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, Kamineni Hospitals
- Aiko Hibino
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hirosaki University
- Gry Houeland
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University
- Heidi C. Howard
- Medical Ethics, Lund Universitet
- S. Zakir Hussain
- SAAZ Genetics
- Charlotta Ingvoldstad Malmgren
- Department of Public Health and Caring Scienec, Uppsala University
- Vera L. Izhevskaya
- Research Centre for Medical Genetics
- Aleksandra Jędrzejak
- Independent Scholar
- Cao Jinhong
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University
- Megumi Kimura
- Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University
- Erika Kleiderman
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University
- Brandi Leach
- RAND Europe
- Keying Liu
- Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
- Deborah Mascalzoni
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University
- Álvaro Mendes
- UnIGENe and CGPP – Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics, IBMC – Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, i3S – Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto
- Jusaku Minari
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University
- Dianne Nicol
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania
- Emilia Niemiec
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University
- Christine Patch
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science
- Jack Pollard
- RAND Europe
- Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna
- Marie Rivière
- DILTEC, Sorbonne Nouvelle
- Lauren Robarts
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science
- Jonathan Roberts
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science
- Virginia Romano
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University
- Haytham A. Sheerah
- Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
- James Smith
- Wellcome Sanger Institute
- Alexandra Soulier
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University
- Claire Steed
- Wellcome Sanger Institute
- Vigdis Stefànsdóttir
- Landspitali, the National University Hospital of Iceland
- Cornelia Tandre
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University
- Adrian Thorogood
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University
- Torsten H. Voigt
- Institute of Sociology, RWTH Aachen University
- Nan Wang
- Medical Ethics Program, Peking University Health Science Center
- Anne V. West
- Indiana University Maurer School of Law
- Go Yoshizawa
- Work Research Institute (AFI), Oslo Metropolitan University
- Anna Middleton
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-021-00903-0
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 13,
no. 1
pp. 1 – 12
Abstract
Abstract Background Public trust is central to the collection of genomic and health data and the sustainability of genomic research. To merit trust, those involved in collecting and sharing data need to demonstrate they are trustworthy. However, it is unclear what measures are most likely to demonstrate this. Methods We analyse the ‘Your DNA, Your Say’ online survey of public perspectives on genomic data sharing including responses from 36,268 individuals across 22 low-, middle- and high-income countries, gathered in 15 languages. We examine how participants perceived the relative value of measures to demonstrate the trustworthiness of those using donated DNA and/or medical information. We examine between-country variation and present a consolidated ranking of measures. Results Providing transparent information about who will benefit from data access was the most important measure to increase trust, endorsed by more than 50% of participants across 20 of 22 countries. It was followed by the option to withdraw data and transparency about who is using data and why. Variation was found for the importance of measures, notably information about sanctions for misuse of data—endorsed by 5% in India but almost 60% in Japan. A clustering analysis suggests alignment between some countries in the assessment of specific measures, such as the UK and Canada, Spain and Mexico and Portugal and Brazil. China and Russia are less closely aligned with other countries in terms of the value of the measures presented. Conclusions Our findings highlight the importance of transparency about data use and about the goals and potential benefits associated with data sharing, including to whom such benefits accrue. They show that members of the public value knowing what benefits accrue from the use of data. The study highlights the importance of locally sensitive measures to increase trust as genomic data sharing continues globally.