A Study on the Validity of Changing the Job Title of Medical Technologist

Abstract

To investigate and accommodate opinions on the revision of the official occupational title of the medical technologist, the Korean Association of Medical Technologists (KAMT) requested 22,638 people registered as its regular members to participate in an online survey and select their two preferred options from the alternative job titles presented. Survey responses were collected from 3,999 people (17.66%). To examine job title preferences among the KAMT members, each respondent was asked to choose two terms from the choice set. As a result, 6,958 responses were obtained, and out of the total responses, 5,555 (79.83%) indicated a choice for a job title that included the word ‘analyst’ as the preferred alternative. The survey results showed that “Diagnostic Laboratory Analyst” was the most preferred alternative selected by the largest proportion of respondents (2,417 responses, 34.73%), followed by “Clinical Laboratory Analyst” (1,710 responses, 24.57%), “Biomedical Pathology Technologist” (758 responses, 10.89%), “Biomedical Analyst” (730 responses, 10.49%), “Biomedical Laboratory Analyst” (730 responses, 10.03%), and “Clinical Laboratory Scientist” (646 responses, 9.26%). Therefore, based on the responses of the surveyed members, results of consultation and literature review, the Standard Classification of Occupations (SCO), and the current status of the job titles used in major countries, it is suggested that the occupational title of medical technologists should be changed by adopting “Diagnostic Laboratory Analyst”, “Biomedical Laboratory Analyst”, or “Biomedical Analyst” as their new official job title.

Keywords

• biomedical analyst
• biomedical laboratory analyst
• diagnostic laboratory analyst
• medical technologist
• standard classification of occupations