Journal of Asthma and Allergy (Apr 2024)
Costs of Air Pollution in California’s San Joaquin Valley: A Societal Perspective of the Burden of Asthma on Emergency Departments and Inpatient Care
Abstract
Gilda Zarate-Gonzalez, Paul Brown, Ricardo Cisneros Department of Public Health, University of California, Merced, CA, USACorrespondence: Gilda Zarate-Gonzalez, Department of Public Health, University of California, Merced, 5200 N Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA, Tel + 1 559-269-3609, Email [email protected]: The San Joaquin Valley (SJV) is often recognized as one of the most polluted regions in the US. Periods of pollution exposure are associated with increased health burden related to respiratory inflammation and undermined lung function, which aggravates respiratory diseases such as asthma and leads to symptoms such as coughing, wheezing, or difficulty breathing. Asthma costs US$ 82 billion annually in healthcare costs, missed work and school in the US.Methods: Employing a societal perspective, a cost of illness design was combined with environmental epidemiological methods to analyze the economic impact of O3, NO2, and PM2.5-related adverse respiratory health outcomes amongst SJV residents who attended the emergency department (ED) or were hospitalized in 2016.Results: Asthma exacerbations monetized value ranged from US$ 3353 to US$ 5003 per ED visit and for hospital admissions US$ 2584 per inpatient day for adults 65 years and older to US$ 3023 per child. The estimated value to society in healthcare costs, productivity losses, school absences, and opportunity costs from air pollution adverse health outcomes totaled US$ 498,014,124 in ED visits and US$ 223,552,720 in hospital admissions for the SJV population in 2016. The marginal reduction in the background concentrations of pollutants would avert 21,786 ED adverse events and 19,328 hospitalizations from the health burden on the SJV population or US$ 8,024,505 cost savings due to O3, US$ 82,482,683 from NO2 reductions, and US$ 46,214,702 from decreased concentration of PM2.5.Conclusion: This study provides evidence that air pollution is a negative externality that imposes substantial social, environmental, and healthcare costs on the SJV. Furthermore, the region would avert significant adverse health outcomes realizing economic savings by reducing air pollution and exposures.Keywords: health economics, air pollution, asthma, cost of illness, public health
