Comparative study between ultrasound and MR enterography in evaluation of Crohn’s disease

Abstract

Abstract Background Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that can affect any part of the gut. Endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis, but it only assesses mucosal lesions. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) can assess disease presence and activity, but it has limitations such as motion sensitivity, long scan time, and high cost. Bowel sonography has been introduced as a non-invasive, practical, safe, and low-cost technique to assess disease activity and complications. In our study we aim to assess the comparability of ultrasound to MRE in evaluation of patients with Crohn’s disease, and its complications. Results Twenty-five patients with 38 Crohn’s disease affected segments were evaluated by bowel ultrasound (BUS) and MRI enterography (MRE), where BUS and MRE showed equivalent diagnostic performance for disease detection and localization (97.4%, 100%), for sensitivity and specificity of both modalities. Peri-mural fluid (89.5%, 94.4%) and mural stratification loss (100%, 100%) showed high sensitivity and specificity by BUS compared to MRE, while for assessment of mural vascularity, BUS showed high sensitivity and specificity for high grade vascularity (100%, 83.3%), but low sensitivity and high specificity for low and moderate vascularity (0%–62.5%, 81.8%) compared to MRE. Complications including fistulae and abscessed were all correctly identified in BUS compared to MRE. Conclusion BUS showed comparable results to MRE for identification, localization, assessment of findings related to disease activity, and complications in cases of Crohn’s disease rendering it a viable alternative to MRE.

Keywords

• Intestinal ultrasound
• Bowel ultrasound
• Magnetic resonance enterography
• MRE
• Crohn’s disease
• IUS