ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research (Sep 2017)
Update of the budget impact analysis of the simplification to atazanavir + ritonavir + lamivudine dual therapy of HIV-positive patients receiving atazanavir-based triple therapies in Italy starting from data of the Atlas-M trial
Abstract
Umberto Restelli,1,2 Massimiliano Fabbiani,3 Simona Di Giambenedetto,3 Carmela Nappi,4 Davide Croce,1,21Center for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC – Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy; 2School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 3Institute of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 4Health Economics, Bristol Myers Squibb S.r.l., Rome, ItalyIn 2017, the authors published an article to assess the financial consequences for the Italian National Health Service, over a 5-year period, of the adoption of a simplification strategy to atazanavir (ATV) + ritonavir (r) + lamivudine (3TC) dual therapy of HIVpositive patients receiving ATV plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) starting from data of the Atlas-M trial at 48 weeks.1Consequently to the publication of the clinical results of the Atlas-M trial at 96 weeks, we updated the model implemented for the analysis, considering the most recent evidence.2The model was adapted considering the transitions among antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) observed in the trial, as reported in Figure 1, for years 1 and 2, and maintaining for years 3, 4, and 5 the same differential effectiveness (percentage of patients without virologic failure) observed between 48 and 96 weeks. In detail, the percentage of virologic failures considered in year 1 were 4.51% for ATV+r+2 NRTI and 0.76% for ATV+r+3TC; and in each following year were 8.66% for ATV+r+2 NRTI and 3.05% for ATV+r+3TC.
