Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics (Jul 2024)

Accuracy of patient‐specific instrumentation for implant positioning in custom‐made total ankle arthroplasty

  • Antonio Mazzotti,
  • Simone Ottavio Zielli,
  • Alberto Arceri,
  • Elena Artioli,
  • Laura Langone,
  • Federico Sgubbi,
  • Giuseppe Geraci,
  • Cesare Faldini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.12026
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 3
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose This retrospective radiological analysis aimed to assess the accuracy of implant positioning in patients with ankle arthritis undergoing custom‐made total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with patient‐specific instrumentation (PSI) compared with preoperative planning. Methods Patients who underwent custom‐made TAA with PSI from January 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively evaluated, focusing on the tibial anterior surface (TAS) angle, tibial lateral surface (TLS) angle and tibiotalar ratio (TTR). Additionally, data regarding the time from the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan to surgery, associated procedures and complications were recorded. Results No associated procedures were performed, and only one intraoperative complication, an iatrogenic lateral malleolar fracture, was recorded. In the coronal plane, custom‐made TAA with PSI consistently achieved precise positioning of prosthetic components, even in cases with significant preoperative deformities or bone deficits. However, a statistically significant deviation from the planned values was observed in the sagittal plane (p = 0.007). A notable correlation was identified between the time elapsed from the preoperative CT scan to surgery and the deviation from the planned to the actual postoperative TAS angle (p < 0.001). Conclusion This study underscores the efficacy of PSI systems in achieving precise positioning in the coronal plane, in accordance with preoperative planning. In contrast, sagittal plane positioning did not demonstrate the same level of accuracy, as evidenced by a statistically significant difference between the planned and postoperative TLS values. Nevertheless, all measurements remained within the recommended range according to the existing literature. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Keywords