Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (May 2024)
The Deployment and Utilization of the Allied Health Professions Support Workforce: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Sarah Etty,1 Beverly Snaith,2,3 Daniella Hinchcliffe,3 Julie Nightingale1 1Department of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK; 2Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; 3Department of Radiology, Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust, Wakefield, UKCorrespondence: Sarah Etty, Centre for Applied Health & Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Robert Winston Building, Broomhall, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK, Email [email protected]: The demand for healthcare services internationally continues to increase, exacerbated by patient backlogs resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and the difficulties in recruiting and retaining healthcare staff. These difficulties have led to increased interest in workforce redesign, and the upskilling of existing staff in all areas of healthcare, including within the Allied Health Professions (AHP). Clinical support staff are a key component of workforce redesign, yet little has been documented on the utilization of this workforce across the wide range of professions that collectively form the AHP workforce. Existing research is also unclear due to the variety of titles used to describe them (eg, allied health assistants, therapy assistants, etc). This study aimed to review how Support Workers and Assistant Practitioners (SWAPs) are utilized within the AHP professions. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL complete, Scopus, and Google Scholar) were searched to find English Language primary research articles that explored the deployment of clinical support staff within Allied Health. Following the scoping review methodology, data from each study were analyzed in terms of design, key findings, and implications. A quality assessment was also completed. Thirty-nine articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies were undertaken in Australia, UK, and USA, and covered a range of AHPs and methodological approaches. Most articles employed qualitative methods, with highly variable research quality identified. Key findings were that cost-effectiveness of this workforce has not been formally evaluated in any setting or AHP discipline, and that support workers are a largely underutilized staff group potentially due to inconsistencies in their deployment and scope of practice, and the lack of a clear career pathway. Rigorous, quantitative, and mixed methods research into the deployment and impact of this staff group is needed in order to gain a clearer understanding of how they are optimally utilized across the different AHP disciplines.Keywords: allied health personnel, workforce, scope of practice, assistant, support worker
