Comparison of Outcomes of Silicone Tube Intubation with or without Dacryoendoscopy for the Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Abstract

In this retrospective study, we compared and analyzed two groups of patients who underwent silicone tube intubation (STI) to treat congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNDO). We employed dacryoendoscopy to visualize the lacrimal pathways of one group. In total, 85 eyes of 69 patients were included (52 of 41 patients in the non-dacryoendoscopy and 33 eyes of 28 patients in the dacryoendoscopy group). Clinical characteristics, dacryoendoscopic findings, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. The overall STI success rate was 91.8%, and the success rate was significantly higher in the dacryoendoscopy versus non-dacryoendoscopy group (97.0% and 88.5%, respectively). For patients p = 0.04). However, in patients lacking Hasner valve obstructions, LDS secretory (50.0%) and structural (50%) obstructions occurred at similar rates, which did not vary by age. Dacryoendoscopy-assisted STI enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of CNDO and identified diverse CNDO etiologies beyond Hasner valve obstructions. These findings emphasize the potential advantages of dacryoendoscopy in surgical treatment for CNDO patients.

Keywords

• congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
• dacryoendoscpy
• silicone tube intubation