Frontiers in Oncology (Sep 2020)

Feasibility of Optical Surface-Guidance for Position Verification and Monitoring of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold

  • Patrick Naumann,
  • Patrick Naumann,
  • Patrick Naumann,
  • Vania Batista,
  • Vania Batista,
  • Vania Batista,
  • Benjamin Farnia,
  • Jann Fischer,
  • Jann Fischer,
  • Jann Fischer,
  • Jakob Liermann,
  • Jakob Liermann,
  • Jakob Liermann,
  • Eric Tonndorf-Martini,
  • Eric Tonndorf-Martini,
  • Eric Tonndorf-Martini,
  • Bernhard Rhein,
  • Bernhard Rhein,
  • Bernhard Rhein,
  • Bernhard Rhein,
  • Jürgen Debus,
  • Jürgen Debus,
  • Jürgen Debus,
  • Jürgen Debus,
  • Jürgen Debus,
  • Jürgen Debus

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.573279
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundReductions in tumor movement allow for more precise and accurate radiotherapy with decreased dose delivery to adjacent normal tissue that is crucial in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is an established approach to mitigate respiratory motion during radiotherapy. We assessed the feasibility of combining modern optical surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) to ensure and monitor reproducibility of DIBH and to ensure accurate tumor localization for SBRT as an imaging-guided precision medicine.MethodsWe defined a new workflow for delivering SBRT in DIBH for lung and liver tumors incorporating SGRT and IGRT with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) twice per treatment fraction. Daily position corrections were analyzed and for every patient two points retrospectively characterized: an anatomically stable landmark (predominately Schmorl’s nodes or spinal enostosis) and a respiratory-dependent landmark (predominately surgical clips or branching vessel). The spatial distance of these points was compared for each CBCT and used as surrogate for intra- and interfractional variability. Differences between the lung and liver targets were assessed using the Welch t-test. Finally, the planning target volumes were compared to those of free-breathing plans, prepared as a precautionary measure in case of technical or patient-related problems with DIBH.ResultsTen patients were treated with SBRT according this workflow (7 liver, 3 lung). Planning target volumes could be reduced significantly from an average of 148 ml in free breathing to 110 ml utilizing DIBH (p < 0.001, paired t-test). After SGRT-based patient set-up, subsequent IGRT in DIBH yielded significantly higher mean corrections for liver targets compared to lung targets (9 mm vs. 5 mm, p = 0.017). Analysis of spatial distance between the fixed and moveable landmarks confirmed higher interfractional variability (interquartile range (IQR) 6.8 mm) than intrafractional variability (IQR 2.8 mm). In contrast, lung target variability was low, indicating a better correlation of patients’ surface to lung targets (intrafractional IQR 2.5 mm and interfractional IQR 1.7 mm).ConclusionSBRT in DIBH utilizing SGRT and IGRT is feasible and results in significantly lower irradiated volumes. Nevertheless, IGRT is of paramount importance given that interfractional variability was high, particularly for liver tumors.

Keywords