Frontiers in Psychology (Apr 2024)

The strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information: the case of COVID 19 preventive behaviours

  • Daniel Pinazo-Calatayud,
  • Sonia Agut-Nieto,
  • Lorena Arahuete,
  • Rosana Peris,
  • Alfonso Barros,
  • Carolina Vázquez-Rodríguez

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1325600
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

Controlling the spread of COVID-19 requires individuals to adopt preventive behaviours, but conspiracy beliefs about its origin are spreading. The aim of this paper is to better comprehend the strength of conspiracy beliefs versus objective COVID-19 information to predict people’s adherence to protective behaviours (getting vaccinated, being tracked through APPs, and keeping social distance from infected people). Study 1 shows that COVID-19 implicit theories detected in the Pre-study were activated as independent factors that constitute people’s interpretations of the virus origin. These beliefs were related to a lesser intention to engage in preventive behaviours and a higher level of mistrust in institutional information, although some beliefs generate positive expectations about COVID-19 consequences. In Study 2, conducted with a different sample, official COVID-19 information was included as an independent variable, but this new variable did not further explain results. Lastly, Study 3 consisting of both previous samples confirmed that conspiracy beliefs had a direct effect on a lesser willingness to engage in preventive actions, a higher mistrust, and positive expectations about COVID-19 consequences. We conclude that objective COVID-19 information did not buffer the effect of conspiracy beliefs; they interfere with actions to prevent it by taking institutions as scapegoats or complicit with secret powers.

Keywords