BMC Cancer (Sep 2023)

Interaction analysis of high-risk pathological features on adjuvant chemotherapy survival benefit in stage II colon cancer patients: a multi-center, retrospective study

  • Kexuan Li,
  • Fuqiang Zhao,
  • Yuchen Guo,
  • Qingbin Wu,
  • Shuangling Luo,
  • Junling Zhang,
  • Heli Li,
  • Shidong Hu,
  • Bin Wu,
  • Guole Lin,
  • Huizhong Qiu,
  • Beizhan Niu,
  • Xiyu Sun,
  • Lai Xu,
  • Junyang Lu,
  • Xiaohui Du,
  • Zheng Wang,
  • Xin Wang,
  • Liang Kang,
  • Ziqiang Wang,
  • Quan Wang,
  • Qian Liu,
  • Yi Xiao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11196-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background We aimed to analyze the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer patients and the impact of high-risk factors on the prognostic effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods This study is a multi-center, retrospective study, A total of 931 patients with stage II colon cancer who underwent curative surgery in 8 tertiary hospitals in China between 2016 and 2017 were enrolled in the study. Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the risk factors of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and to test the multiplicative interaction of pathological factors and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). The additive interaction was presented using the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). The Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) was utilized to assess the interaction of continuous variables on the ACT effect. Results A total of 931 stage II colon cancer patients were enrolled in this study, the median age was 63 years old (interquartile range: 54–72 years) and 565 (60.7%) patients were male. Younger patients (median age, 58 years vs 65 years; P < 0.001) and patients with the following high-risk features, such as T4 tumors (30.8% vs 7.8%; P < 0.001), grade 3 lesions (36.0% vs 22.7%; P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (22.1% vs 6.8%; P < 0.001) and perineural invasion (19.4% vs 13.6%; P = 0.031) were more likely to receive ACT. Patients with perineural invasion showed a worse OS and marginally worse DFS (hazardous ratio [HR] 2.166, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.282–3.660, P = 0.004; HR 1.583, 95% CI 0.985–2.545, P = 0.058, respectively). Computing the interaction on a multiplicative and additive scale revealed that there was a significant interaction between PNI and ACT in terms of DFS (HR for multiplicative interaction 0.196, p = 0.038; RERI, -1.996; 95%CI, -3.600 to -0.392) and OS (HR for multiplicative interaction 0.112, p = 0.042; RERI, -2.842; 95%CI, -4.959 to -0.725). Conclusions Perineural invasion had prognostic value, and it could also influence the effect of ACT after curative surgery. However, other high-risk features showed no implication of efficacy for ACT in our study. Trial registration This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03794193 (04/01/2019).

Keywords