Implementation Science Communications (Feb 2020)

Development of a theory-driven implementation strategy for cancer management guidelines in sub-Saharan Africa

  • Rebecca J. DeBoer,
  • Jerry Ndumbalo,
  • Stephen Meena,
  • Mamsau T. Ngoma,
  • Nanzoke Mvungi,
  • Sadiq Siu,
  • Msiba Selekwa,
  • Sarah K. Nyagabona,
  • Rohan Luhar,
  • Geoffrey Buckle,
  • Tracy Kuo Lin,
  • Lindsay Breithaupt,
  • Stephanie Kennell-Heiling,
  • Beatrice Mushi,
  • Godfrey Sama Philipo,
  • Elia J. Mmbaga,
  • Julius Mwaiselage,
  • Katherine Van Loon

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00007-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Despite recent international efforts to develop resource-stratified clinical practice guidelines for cancer, there has been little research to evaluate the best strategies for dissemination and implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Guideline publication alone is insufficient. Extensive research has shown that structured, multifaceted implementation strategies that target barriers to guideline use are most likely to improve adherence; however, most of this research has been conducted in high-income countries. There is a pressing need to develop and evaluate guideline implementation strategies for cancer management in LMICs in order to address stark disparities in cancer outcomes. Methods In preparation for the launch of Tanzania’s first National Cancer Treatment Guidelines, we developed a theory-driven implementation strategy for guideline-based practice at Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI). Here, we use the Intervention Mapping framework to provide a detailed stepwise description of our process. First, we conducted a needs assessment to identify barriers and facilitators to guideline-based practice at ORCI. Second, we defined both proximal and performance objectives for our implementation strategy. Third, we used the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior/Behavior Change Wheel (COM-B/BCW) framework to categorize the barriers and facilitators, choose behavior change techniques most likely to overcome targeted barriers and leverage facilitators, and select a feasible mode of delivery for each technique. Fourth, we organized these modes of delivery into a phased implementation strategy. Fifth, we operationalized each component of the strategy. Sixth, we identified the indicators of the process, outcome, and impact of our intervention and developed an evaluation plan to measure them using a mixed methods approach. Discussion We developed a robust, multifaceted guideline implementation strategy derived from a prominent behavior change theory for use in Tanzania. The barriers and strategies we generated are consistent with those well established in the literature, enhancing the validity and generalizability of our process and results. Through our rigorous evaluation plan and systematic account of modifications and adaptations, we will characterize the transferability of “proven” guideline implementation strategies to LMICs. We hope that by describing our process in detail, others may endeavor to replicate it, meeting a widespread need for dedicated efforts to implement cancer guidelines in LMICs.

Keywords