Real-world study on the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens in treatment-naïve CHB patients with high viral load

Abstract

Abstract Evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of different treatment regimens for treatment-naïve high viral load chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Between January 2021 and August 2022, CHB patients with HBV DNA ≥ 107 IU/mL were collected from four medical centers in Shenzhen. Patients treated with mono or combine antiviral therapy. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of virological response at 48 weeks, and other endpoints included changes in HBsAg, HBeAg, ALT, and eGFR at 48 weeks. We used propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance the bias. Weighted logistics regression was used to estimate the factors affecting virological response. A total of 391 patients were included in the study, with 296 patients undergoing statistical analysis after IPTW. The patients were distributed into four groups: ETV (n = 62), TDF (n = 89), TAF (n = 36), TDF + LdT/ETV (n = 109). The 48-week cumulative incidence of virological response was significantly lower in ETV group (52.3%) compared to TDF (71.7%), TAF (74.2%), and TDF + LdT/ETV groups (77.9%) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HBsAg loss among the four groups, but the HBeAg seroconversion rate was significantly higher in the TAF group. The ALT normalization rate was significantly higher in the TAF group (72.2%) compared to the others at 48 weeks (P < 0.05). In treatment-naïve CHB patients with high viral load, combination therapy was not superior to TDF or TAF monotherapy in virological response. Patients treated with TDF or TAF showed superior virological response compared to those treated with ETV. The TAF group demonstrated superiority in terms of ALT normalization and HBeAg seroconversion.

Keywords

• Hepatitis B, Chronic
• Virologic Response
• Viral load
• Nucleos(t)ide analogues