Consilium Medicum (May 2022)
Registry analysis of patients with severe allergic asthma and clinically relevant sensitization to fungal allergens treated with genetically engineered biologics
Abstract
Background. Fungal sensitization (FS) often escapes the attention of clinicians when assessing the spectrum of sensitization in patients with atopic diseases. According to cohort studies is found in 310% of the general population and in 720% of asthmatics; the proportion of patients with severe bronchial asthma (SBA) with HS ranges from 35 to 75%. Fungal conidia have a 1000-fold higher exposure and are among the most important clinically relevant allergens in asthma. Exposure to fungal allergens is capable of generating a sustained T2 response with production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-5 and 13, which is indirectly related to the severity of airway eosinophilia. The identification of specific serum IgE is considered the benchmark diagnostic sign of FS, and the encapsulated hydrophobic carrier polymer system is considered preferable to skin prick tests. The process of reclassifying diseases with fungal lung lesions is confusing treatment strategies, leaving the FS problem underestimated. A series of publications have shown that omalizumab and other biologics targeting IL-5 or IL-5 receptor (IL5R) alpha are effective in treating SBA with FS. However, there remains an unmet need in real clinical practice for standardized approaches to genetically engineered biological therapies (BT) for different phenotypes of SBA, especially those associated with impaired microbiological homeostasis and this type of sensitization. Aim. Using retrospective analysis of clinical-dynamic observational data from patients on BT treatment in a real clinical setting to determine phenotypic features of severe allergic bronchial asthma with FS and to perform additional detailed analysis of a cohort of patients on anti-IgE therapy. Materials and methods. A retrospective observational single-center registry study was conducted between June 2017 and August 2021 at the City Reference Center for Allergology and Immunology. The baseline cohort consisted of 198 patients with severe allergic AD who were in the initial phase of BT. Inclusion criteria: age of patients over 18 years; presence of severe allergic bronchial asthma. Complex initial examination of patients included determination of FS by two methods: ImmunoCap ISAC to fungal allergic components alt a1, alt 6 (fungi of genus Alternaria) and asp f1, asp f3, asp f6 (fungi of genus Aspergillus). Specific IgE determinations on fungal panels. Sensitization to fungi was detected in 47 people during allergy examination. The following criteria were considered in evaluation of response to omalizumab: AST score less than 19 and/or difference between initial AST score and this score in dynamics less than 3 points; FEV 1 score less than 80; combination of 2 listed criteria. The minimum period of BT was 16 weeks. Nonparametric methods of descriptive statistics were used: median, interquartile range. Differences were considered significant at p0.05. Data were statistically processed using nonparametric methods in IBM SPSS Statistics V-22 program. MannWhitney U-test and KruskalWallis one-way analysis of variance were used to compare quantitative characteristics. Fisher's 2 test was used to compare qualitative characteristics. Results. Characteristics of the eosinophilic phenotype of SBA combined with FS: middle-aged patients, more often women, with relatively early onset of AD and high baseline eosinophil levels before prescription of biological drug therapy. Concomitant atopic dermatitis and food allergies are additional frequent features of this phenotype. Analysis of the effect of FS on achieving response to omalizumab and further consideration of switching to alternative therapy in SBA and FS patients showed the need to avoid premature revision and perform no earlier than the 10th month of therapy due to delayed response formation. Given the aggressive impact of FS on the barrier functions of the bronchial tree epithelium, it is advisable to test patients for FS at the initial diagnosis of AD. In the presence of atopic dermatitis and/or food allergy as T2 comorbidities in patients with SBA, early testing for FS and increased control of local and systemic inflammation are appropriate, which may improve long-term outcomes and reduce risks of further damage to natural barriers. Conclusion. Further research on various aspects of FS and its role in allergic diseases is extremely relevant in the current context.
Keywords
