Pharmacia (Apr 2021)

Pharmacotherapy of patients with atrial fibrillation and restored sinus rhythm – is the medication with spironolactone beneficial in this case?

  • Antoniya Kisheva,
  • Yoto Yotov,
  • Evgeni Grigorov

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.68.e63223
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 68, no. 2
pp. 301 – 306

Abstract

Read online Read online Read online

Objective: Atrial fibrillation is progressive disease with important health consequences, in which fibrosis is a key player. The aim of our study is to assess the effect of mineralcorticoid blockade on top of standard treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation after sinus rhythm restoration on the recurrence of the arrhythmia, hospitalizations and on the changes in levels of Galectin-3 as a marker of fibrosis. Methods: We prospectively studied 101 consecutive patients (56 females) at mean age 68.2 ± 7 with atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm restoration, who were randomized on treatment with spironolactone on top of standard treatment or “usual care”. They were followed up for recurrences, hospitalization and death. The effect of spironolactone on safety was evaluated. Results: Recurrences of AF were detected in 64% of non-spironolactone group vs 57% in spironolactone group (p = 0.44). Spironolactone reduced the hospitalizations for AF, but it was not significant (p = 0.14). A Cox regression model showed only protective effect of spironolactone on AF hospitalizations, HR = 0.48, 95%CI = 0.2–1.15, р = 0.098. The same survival model for all-cause hospitalizations reached significance, with reduction of the events in the spironolactone group, HR- 0.44, 95% CI 0.2–0.94, р = 0.035. There was no difference regarding the composite endpoint (recurrences, all cause hospitalizations and death). Treatment with spironolactone did not influence the Gal-3 levels. Treatment with spironolactone has not influenced significantly the levels of serum potassium and creatinine. Conclusion: Treatment with spironolactone has protective effect regarding hospitalization for atrial fibrillation and significantly reduces all cause hospitalizations. It does not influence the biomarker of fibrosis Gal-3 after one-year treatment. The use of spironolactone in patients with AF is safe, but regular follow up is needed and recommended. Further studies are necessary, to clarify the potential of spironolactone to improve the AF prognosis.