Frontiers in Neurology (Apr 2023)

Fallers after stroke: a retrospective study to investigate the combination of postural sway measures and clinical information in faller’s identification

  • Johanna Jonsdottir,
  • Fabiola Giovanna Mestanza Mattos,
  • Alessandro Torchio,
  • Chiara Corrini,
  • Davide Cattaneo,
  • Davide Cattaneo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1157453
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundFalls can have devastating effects on quality of life. No clear relationships have been identified between clinical and stabilometric postural measures and falling in persons after stroke.ObjectiveThis cross-sectional study investigates the value of including stabilometric measures of sway with clinical measures of balance in models for identification of faller chronic stroke survivors, and the relations between variables.MethodsClinical and stabilometric data were collected from a convenience sample of 49 persons with stroke in hospital care. They were categorized as fallers (N = 21) or non-fallers (N = 28) based on the occurrence of falls in the previous 6 months. Logistic regression (model 1) was performed with clinical measures, including the Berg Balance scale (BBS), Barthel Index (BI), and Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). A second model (model 2) was run with stabilometric measures, including mediolateral (SwayML) and anterior–posterior sway (SwayAP), velocity of antero-posterior (VelAP) and medio-lateral sway (VelML), and absolute position of center of pressure (CopX abs). A third stepwise regression model was run including all variables, resulting in a model with SwayML, BBS, and BI (model 3). Finally, correlations between independent variables were analyzed.ResultsThe area under the curve (AUC) for model 1 was 0.68 (95%CI: 0.53–0.83, sensitivity = 95%, specificity = 39%) with prediction accuracy of 63.3%. Model 2 resulted in an AUC of 0.68 (95%CI: 0.53–0.84, sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 57%) with prediction accuracy of 65.3%. The AUC of stepwise model 3 was 0.74 (95%CI: 0.60–0.88, sensitivity = 57%, specificity = 81%) with prediction accuracy of 67.4%. Finally, statistically significant correlations were found between clinical variables (p < 0.05), only velocity parameters were correlated with balance performance (p < 0.05).ConclusionA model combining BBS, BI, and SwayML was best at identifying faller status in persons in the chronic phase post stroke. When balance performance is poor, a high SwayML may be part of a strategy protecting from falls.

Keywords