Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering (Jul 2022)

Integrating 3D cameras into sterile surgical environments: A comparison of different protective materials regarding scan accuracy

  • Wagner Lars,
  • Bernhard Lukas,
  • Fuchtmann Jonas,
  • Asim Karaoglu Mert,
  • Ladikos Alexander,
  • Feußner Hubertus,
  • Wilhelm Dirk

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2022-0007
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 25 – 29

Abstract

Read online

This work presents a sterile concept for 3D cameras within sterile surgical environments. In the digital operating room (OR), such cameras can serve as a valuable data source for cognitive workflow assistance systems, e.g decision or mechatronic support systems. One recent example are robotic assistants for instrument handling, such as the robotic scrub nurse currently developed in the framework of the SASHA-OR research project1. In this context, we detect laparoscopic instruments and the surgical environment with a 3D camera, whereby hygienic requirements need to be met. Using a Zivid Two sensor, we generated point clouds of the laparoscopic instruments located in an instrument holder and a drop zone. We compared the effect of using different pane types and thicknesses for the sterile camera enclosure and compared the performance with and without protective pane in terms of the point cloud accuracy. When analyzing multiple pane types, polymethyl methacrylate with 0.5 mm thickness (PMMA 0.5) provided the best results. At a scan distance of 560 mm to the surface center, which is required for the complete acquisition of a laparoscopic instrument, PMMA 0.5 achieved the smallest Chamfer distance (CD) values for both the scans with the laparoscopic instruments in the instrument holder (0.23 ± 1.52 mm) and in the drop zone (0.12 ± 0.25 mm).

Keywords