Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Under 3-Dimensional Guidance to Treat Pure Aortic Regurgitation in Patients with a Large Aortic Annulus

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a challenge for patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) and a large annulus. Our goal was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and predictors of transapical TAVR in AR patients with a large annulus and noncalcification and the feasibility and safety of 3-dimensional printing (3DP) in the preprocedural simulation. Methods: Patients with a large annulus (diameter >29 mm) were enrolled and divided into the simulation (n = 43) and the nonsimulation group (n = 82). Surgeons used the specific 3DP model of the simulation group to simulate the main steps before the procedure and to refit the transcatheter heart valve (THV) according to the simulated results. Results: The average annular diameter of the overall cohort was 29.8 ± 0.7 mm. Compared with the nonsimulation group, the simulation group used a higher proportion of extra oversizing for THVs (97.6% vs. 85.4%, p = 0.013), and the coaxiality performance was better (9.7 ± 3.9° vs. 12.7 ± 3.8°, p < 0.001). Both THV displacement and ≥ mild paravalvular leakage (PVL) occurred only in the nonsimulation group (9.8% vs. 0, p < 0.001; 9.8% vs. 0, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that extra oversizing, coaxial angle and annulus diameter were independent predictors of THV displacement and ≥ mild PVL, respectively. Conclusions: Based on 3DP guidance, transapical TAVR using extra oversizing was safe and feasible for patients with noncalcified AR with a large annulus. Extra oversizing and coaxial angle were predictors of postprocedural THV displacement and ≥ mild PVL in such patients.

Keywords

• aortic regurgitation
• transcatheter aortic valve replacement
• large annulus
• 3-dimensional printing
• extra oversizing