The relationship between the shape of rotator cuff tears and shoulder anatomical parameters

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to investigate the potential relationship between shoulder anatomical parameters and the shape of rotator cuff tears (L-shaped, U-shaped, and crescent-shaped). Materials and methods The study included 160 (n:160) patients. Patients were divided into four groups: crescent type, u type and L type tears and control group. There were 40 cases in each group. The operated patients were divided into three groups based on the shape of the tears in arthroscopic images. Measurements of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA), Greater Tuberosity Angle (GTA), Acromion Index (AI), Lateral Acromion Angle (LAA), and Humerus Footprint width (coronal width and sagittal width) were taken in each group and compared. Results Patients were divided into four different groups: Crescent type group (n:40), L type group (n:40), U type group (n:40) and control group (n:40). Upon assessing the coronal and sagittal width measurements, The mean coranal width measurement of the L-type tear group was 12.62 ± 0.29 mm, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). The mean sagittal width of the L-type tear group was 34.95 ± 0.29 mm, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). When the groups were evaluated based on GTA, CSA, and AI data, the mean GTA measurement of the L-type tear group was 73.03 ± 0.95 degrees, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). The mean CSA measurement of the L-type tear group was 34.77 ± 0.66 degrees, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). The mean AI measurement of the L-type tear group was 0.77 ± 0.02, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). When the groups were evaluated based on LAA data, the mean LAA measurement of the L-type tear group was 76.98 ± 1.04 degrees, which was significantly lower than all other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion In our study, especially in L-shaped tears, measurements of GTA, CSA, AI, LAA, coronal and sagittal width were found to be different compared to the control group. These results suggest that shoulder anatomy affects the mechanisms of rotator cuff tear formation and that these parameters play a more significant role in L-shaped tears.

Keywords

• Rotator Cuff tears
• Shoulder arthroscopy
• Shoulder anatomy