Comparative clinical study of attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation using clinical assessment guidance versus neuromuscular block monitoring guidance

Abstract

Background: The hemodynamic response to the stress of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation does not present a problem for most patients, except in cardiovascular or cerebral disease. Various anesthetic techniques and drugs are available to control the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. However administration of an additional drug may adversely affect hemodynamics of the patient or unnecessarily increase the depth of anesthesia. Hence a non pharmacological measure to reduce response is preferred. The purpose of this study was to compare the hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and intubation when choice of the moment of intubation is directed by either clinical assessment and neuromuscular monitoring with train of four. Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomised into two groups. In Group M endotracheal intubation was done after train of four count became zero in adductor pollicis muscle. In Group C timing of intubation was determined clinically by assessment of jaw muscle relaxation. Changes in heart rate (HR), systolic BP (SBP), diasolic BP (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), time between the administration of neuromuscular blocking agent and endotracheal intubation was recorded. Results were analysed by the analysis of variance and chi square test. Results: Heart rate, SBP, DBP and mean arterial pressure were significantly higher in Group C as compared to Group M after laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation (P<0.05). The mean time required for onset of intubation was significantly shorter in Group C compared to Group M. Conclusion: The objective assessment of neuromuscular relaxation prior to endotracheal intubation provides better attenuation of hemodynamic responses.

Keywords

• hemodynamic response
• laryngoscopy
• endotracheal intubation
• neuromuscular block