SCHOOL ECONOMY IN THE INVENTING EDUCATION PARADIGM

Abstract

Requirements applied to specialists for working in the sixth wave of innovation, i.e. Industry 4.0, determines the necessity of education system improvement concerning training solution and, as a result, creation of inventive ideas. Today in our country this process is stimulated by various competitions, including financing for the implementation of results. In training programs knowledge approach still prevails. The corresponding methods, along with stimulation, are included into educational programs in leading foreign educational institutions, mostly at universities. If in previous decades mostly divergent methods were studied (morphological analysis, the focal objects method, synectics, etc.), then now the leading place is taken by theory of inventive problem solving – TRIZ created in the former USSR by G.S. Altshuller in connection with the increasing leading corporations requirement for specialists in TRIZ. This fact gives Russia essential competitive advantages in the innovative way of development. For effective use of this advantage it is important to form the TRIZ-based innovative thinking beginning from school days. For this purpose authors developed new methods in TRIZ-pedagogics, uniting metasubject results (in higher education institutions – competences) into the system of innovative thinking. As a result, both educational and economic effects are achieved: the intellectual property created in educational process. For schools it is the possibility of significant improvement of financing causing importance of new mechanisms of intellectual property fixation, protection and implementation. Recommendations about creation of such system are provided in the article. Purpose Defining the opportunities and ways of improving economic effectiveness of educational activities in the paradigm of inventive education. Tasks: – analysis of school education institutions experience in implementation of approaches preceding the inventing education paradigm formation; – giving recommendations concerning the economic effectiveness enhancement of the implementation of inventive education paradigm. Methodology – analytical method: in the article practical results of the inventive education elements approbation are analyzed; – dialectic method: the article defines the system and dialectic kernel of TRIZ, which is the basis of inventive education paradigm. Results: the possibility is confirmed and the ways of improving economic indicators in school and additional education system are shown. Practical implications: it is expedient to apply the obtained results at schools, lyceums, gymnasiums, institutions of additional education at which engineering and technological or physical and mathematical classes, engineering classes, scientific and technical workshops and author’s methods of the knowledge invention and innovative projects are applied: both for improvement of Federal educational standards implementation quality, and for improvement of economic indicators.

Keywords

• изобретающее образование
• новая политехническая школа
• метод изобретения знаний
• метод инновационных проектов
• интеллектуальная собственность
• патентная деятельность