Anticoagulation for Patients With Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation and End‐Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

Abstract

Background Concomitant atrial fibrillation and end‐stage renal disease is common and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Although oral anticoagulants have been well established to prevent thromboembolism, the applicability in patients under long‐term dialysis remains debatable. The study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in the dialysis‐dependent population. Methods and Results An updated network meta‐analysis based on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Studies published up to December 2022 were included. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban 2.5/5 mg twice daily), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and no anticoagulation were compared on safety and efficacy outcomes. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding, thromboembolism, and all‐cause death. A total of 42 studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials, with 185 864 subjects were pooled. VKAs were associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding than either no anticoagulation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.34–1.61) or DOACs (DOACs versus VKAs; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64–0.84]). For the prevention of thromboembolism, the efficacies of VKAs, DOACs, and no anticoagulation were equivalent. Nevertheless, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with fewer embolic events. There were no differences in all‐cause death with the administration of VKAs, DOACs, or no anticoagulation. Conclusions For dialysis‐dependent populations, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with better efficacy, while dabigatran and apixaban demonstrated better safety. No anticoagulation was a noninferior alterative, and VKAs were associated with the worst outcomes.

Keywords

• anticoagulation
• atrial fibrillation
• chronic kidney disease
• dialysis
• meta‐analysis