Patient Preference and Adherence (Dec 2021)
Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Xuejing Li,1– 3,* Meiqi Meng,1– 3,* Junqiang Zhao,4,5 Xiaoyan Zhang,1– 3 Dan Yang,1– 3 Jiaxin Fang,1– 3 Junxin Wang,1– 3 Liu Han,6 Yufang Hao1– 3 1School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 3Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 5Center for Research on Health and Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 6Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yufang Hao Liangxiang High Education Park, Fangshan District, Beijing, 102488, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86-13552850210Email [email protected]: For most breast cancer (BC) patients who have undergone a mastectomy, the decision whether to proceed with breast reconstruction (BR) is complicated and requires deliberation. Shared decision-making (SDM) helps to address those needs and promote informed value-based decisions. However, little is known about the SDM status for BR in BC patients. This scoping review describes: 1) basic characteristics of studies on BR SDM in BC patients; 2) factors influencing BR SDM in BC patients; 3) experience and perception of BR SDM in BC patients; and 4) outcome measures reported. This review was performed in accordance with the Arksey and O’Malley methodology. A total of 5 English and 4 Chinese databases were searched, as well as different sources from grey literature. The data extraction form was developed by referring to the objectives and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF). Data was analyzed using thematic analysis, framework analysis and descriptive statistics, with findings presented in the tables and diagrams. A total of 1481 records were retrieved and 42 of these included after screening. In 21 (21/42, 50%) of the studies, patient decision aids (PDAs) were utilized, and in 17 (17/42, 40.48%) of the studies, the factors influencing the implementation of SDM were explored. Of these 17 studies, the factors influencing the implementation of SDM were categorized into the following: the patient level (17/17, 100%), the healthcare level (2/17, 11.76%) and the organizational and system level (7/17, 41.18%). A total of 8 (19.05%) of the 42 studies focused on patients’ experiences and perceptions of SDM, and all studies used qualitative research methods. Of these 8 studies, a total of 7 (7/8, 87.50%) focused on patients’ experiences of SDM participation, and 4 (4/8, 50.00%) focused on patients’ perceptions of SDM. A total of 24 studies (24/42, 57.14%) involved quantitative outcome measures, where 49 items were divided into three classifications according to the outcomes of ODSF: the quality of the decision (17/24, 70.83%), the quality of the decision-making process (20/24, 83.33%), and impact (13/24, 54.17%). Although researchers have paid less attention to other research points in the field of SDM, compared to the design and application of SDM interventional tools, the research team still presents some equally noteworthy points through scoping review. For instance, the various factors influencing BC patients’ participation in SDM for BR (especially at the healthcare provider level and at the organizational system level), patients’ experiences and perceptions. Systematic reviews (SRs) should be conducted to quantify the impact of these different factors on BR SDM. Implementation of scientific theories and methods can inform the exploration and integration of these factors.Keywords: shared decision-making, patients’ decisional aids, breast reconstruction, breast cancer, mastectomy, Ottawa Decision Support Framework
