Palliative Medicine Reports (Oct 2020)

Clinician Perspectives on Implementing Video Visits in Home-Based Palliative Care

  • Thearis A. Osuji,
  • Mayra Macias,
  • Carmit McMullen,
  • Eric Haupt,
  • Brian Mittman,
  • Richard A. Mularski,
  • Susan E. Wang,
  • Henry Werch,
  • Huong Q. Nguyen,
  • Ernest Shen,
  • Ari Padilla,
  • Janet Lee,
  • Kathleen Estrada,
  • Rebecca Biddle,
  • Byron Batz,
  • Jasamin Disney,
  • Teresa Martinez,
  • Rose Roxas,
  • Peter Khang,
  • Dan Huynh,
  • Mary Machado,
  • Gina Andres,
  • Angel Vargas,
  • Britta Torgrimson-Ojerio,
  • Madeline Peyton,
  • John Brandes,
  • Emily Schield,
  • Phyllis Ramey,
  • Chris Carlson,
  • Paula Edwards,
  • Vicki Krepps,
  • Jennifer Black,
  • Erin Bruner,
  • Mary Ann McBurnie,
  • Ning Smith,
  • Suzanne Gillespie,
  • Kim Funkhouser,
  • Morgan Fuoco,
  • Dea Papajorgji-Taylor,
  • Phil Crawford,
  • Kelly Kirk,
  • Joe Cerizo,
  • Kimberly Stewart,
  • Daniel Vaughn,
  • Meagan Shaw,
  • Katie Vaughn,
  • Joanne Lynn,
  • Lynn Reinke,
  • Charles Anderson,
  • Summer Austin-Bowden,
  • David Baker,
  • Bill Clark,
  • Janet Corrigan,
  • Jennie Chin Hansen,
  • Maureen Henry,
  • Keung Luke,
  • Thomas Lee,
  • Carol Levine,
  • Kristine Maberry,
  • Diane Meier,
  • Carol Joy Phillips,
  • Sarah Scholle,
  • June Simmons,
  • Judy Thomas,
  • Patricia Ganz,
  • Mary Naylor,
  • Soo Borson,
  • Kevin Cain

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/PMR.2020.0074

Abstract

Read online

Background: Despite the increasing use and acceptance of technology in health care, there is limited evidence on the usefulness and appropriate use of telehealth in home-based palliative care (HBPC). As part of the process evaluation of a pragmatic trial of video visits in HBPC, we assessed clinician experience with video visit implementation. Methods: We assessed clinicians' experiences with and perception of the usefulness and appropriateness of video visits using anonymous surveys and brief qualitative interviews with a subset of survey participants. Qualitative analyses were guided by sociotechnical frameworks that emphasize technology's ?value proposition? for its end users as being key to adoption. Results: Clinicians (36 physicians and 48 registered nurses) generally had favorable attitudes toward video visits and telehealth. Respondents felt confident in the skills needed to make their role in video visits successful. Clinicians were neutral on whether video visits were useful for their practice or enhanced the patient?caregiver experience. Clinicians found video visits to be most appropriate for follow-up care (as opposed to start of care). The interviews yielded two themes that complemented the survey findings: (1) factors enhancing the value proposition (positive responses from patients and families and convenience) and (2) factors diminishing the value proposition (issues related to the technology and scheduling). Discussion: Our findings provide insights into clinicians' experiences with implementing remote video physician consultations, facilitated by a nurse in the patient's home in the pre-COVID-19 era. Clinician views about video visits may have shifted with the pandemic, which occurred after our data collection was complete. Clinical Trials Registration No. NCT#03694431.

Keywords