Tomography (Oct 2024)

Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction with Elevated Filling Pressures Is Associated with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Atrial Fibrillation

  • Zubair Bashir,
  • Liqi Shu,
  • Yuqian Guo,
  • Edward W. Chen,
  • Shuyuan Wang,
  • Eric D. Goldstein,
  • Maheen Rana,
  • Narendra Kala,
  • Xing Dai,
  • Daniel Mandel,
  • Shadi Yaghi,
  • Phinnara Has,
  • Mingxing Xie,
  • Tao Wang,
  • James Simmons,
  • Christopher Song,
  • Philip Haines

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography10100124
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 10
pp. 1694 – 1705

Abstract

Read online

Background/Objectives: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and elevated left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) are strong predictors of clinical outcomes across various populations. However, their diagnostic utility in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) remains unclear. We hypothesized that LVDD with elevated LVFP (based on echocardiography) was more likely to be prevalent in ESUS compared to non-cardioembolic stroke (NCE) and to be associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) on follow-up monitoring. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study that included adult patients with a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke between January 2016 and June 2017. LV function was assessed by inpatient transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), and stroke etiology was adjudicated by the neurologist per the consensus criteria. Patients with cardioembolic stroke and those with indeterminate diastolic function on TTE were excluded. Baseline patient characteristics and clinical variables were compared among patients with and without LVDD and elevated LVFP. Multivariable regression models were used to assess the associations between diastolic dysfunction, ESUS, and AF detection in ESUS patients. Results: We identified 509 patients with ESUS and NCE stroke who had reported diastolic function. The mean age was 64.19 years, 45.19% were female, and 146 had LVDD with available LVFP data. LVDD was not associated with ESUS (adjusted OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.90–2.27, p = 0.130) or atrial fibrillation (AF) detection on cardiac monitoring (adjusted OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 0.75–4.72, p = 0.179). However, LVDD with elevated LVFP was borderline associated with ESUS (adjusted OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 0.99–4.77, p = 0.054) and significantly associated with AF detection (adjusted OR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.07–12.06, p = 0.038). Conclusions: Our data suggest that LVDD with elevated LVFP is borderline associated with ESUS and significantly associated with AF detection on follow-up cardiac monitoring. Therefore, the presence of LVDD with an increased probability of elevated LVFP may help identify a subset of stroke patients more likely to have ESUS, potentially due to atrial cardiopathy with underlying occult AF. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation in patients with ESUS and LVDD with elevated LVFP.

Keywords