Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications (May 2020)

Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and interaction energy and DFT studies of 2-(2,3-dihydro-1H-perimidin-2-yl)-6-methoxyphenol

  • Ballo Daouda,
  • Nanou Tiéba Tuo,
  • Tuncer Hökelek,
  • Kangah Niameke Jean-Baptiste,
  • Kodjo Charles Guillaume,
  • Kablan Ahmont Landry Claude,
  • El Mokhtar Essassi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020004284
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 76, no. 5
pp. 605 – 610

Abstract

Read online

The title compound, C18H16N2O2, consists of perimidine and methoxyphenol units, where the tricyclic perimidine unit contains a naphthalene ring system and a non-planar C4N2 ring adopting an envelope conformation with the NCN group hinged by 47.44 (7)° with respect to the best plane of the other five atoms. In the crystal, O—HPhnl...NPrmdn and N—HPrmdn...OPhnl (Phnl = phenol and Prmdn = perimidine) hydrogen bonds link the molecules into infinite chains along the b-axis direction. Weak C—H...π interactions may further stabilize the crystal structure. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H...H (49.0%), H...C/C...H (35.8%) and H...O/O...H (12.0%) interactions. Hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions are the dominant interactions in the crystal packing. Computational chemistry indicates that in the crystal, the O—HPhnl...NPrmdn and N—HPrmdn...OPhnl hydrogen-bond energies are 58.4 and 38.0 kJ mol−1, respectively. Density functional theory (DFT) optimized structures at the B3LYP/ 6–311 G(d,p) level are compared with the experimentally determined molecular structure in the solid state. The HOMO–LUMO behaviour was elucidated to determine the energy gap.

Keywords