Performance of disk diffusion and broth microdilution for fosfomycin susceptibility testing of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the susceptibility of clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to fosfomycin and to determine the concordance of disk diffusion (DD) and broth microdilution (BMD) with agar dilution (AD) for fosfomycin susceptibility testing. Methods: The activity of fosfomycin against 225 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 64), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 68), Enterobacter spp. (n = 28) and P. aeruginosa (n = 65) was tested by AD, DD and BMD. For DD, results were recorded considering and not considering colonies growing within the inhibition halo as recommended by the CLSI and EUCAST, respectively. Escherichia coli breakpoints were used for all Enterobacterales. Results were reported as categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME; false-resistant), very major error (VME; false-susceptible) and minor error (any other discrepancies). Results: Fosfomycin susceptibility of all tested species was >90% by AD. Following CLSI guidelines, DD was the only method reaching ≥90% CA with AD for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, albeit yielding 6% ME. Neither DD nor BMD achieved acceptable CA percentages for Enterobacter spp. Following EUCAST guidelines, none of the methods had CA ≥ 90%. For Enterobacterales, the best performance of DD is achieved when read as indicated by EUCAST but interpreted according the CLSI breakpoints (>97% CA; 0% VME; ≤2% ME). For P. aeruginosa, BMD yielded the best results (89% CA; 0% VME; 11% ME). Conclusion: Neither DD or BMD provide accurate results owing to unacceptable ME and VME percentages even when performed as intended by the guidelines.

Keywords

• Fosfomycin
• Antimicrobial activity
• Enterobacterales
• Pseudomonas aeruginosa
• Susceptibility tests