Earth and Space Science (Nov 2024)
Prospects of Predicting the Polar Motion Based on the Results of the Second Earth Orientation Parameters Prediction Comparison Campaign
- Tomasz Kur,
- Justyna Śliwińska‐Bronowicz,
- Malgorzata Wińska,
- Henryk Dobslaw,
- Jolanta Nastula,
- Aleksander Partyka,
- Santiago Belda,
- Christian Bizouard,
- Dale Boggs,
- Sara Bruni,
- Lue Chen,
- Mike Chin,
- Sujata Dhar,
- Robert Dill,
- PengShuo Duan,
- Jose M. Ferrandiz,
- Junyang Gou,
- Richard Gross,
- Sonia Guessoum,
- Songtao Han,
- Robert Heinkelmann,
- ChengLi Huang,
- Christopher Irrgang,
- Jacek Kudrys,
- Jia Li,
- Marcin Ligas,
- Lintao Liu,
- Weitao Lu,
- Volker Mayer,
- Wei Miao,
- Maciej Michalczak,
- Sadegh Modiri,
- Michiel Otten,
- Todd Ratcliff,
- Shrishail Raut,
- Jan Saynisch‐Wagner,
- Matthias Schartner,
- Erik Schoenemann,
- Harald Schuh,
- M. Kiani Shahvandi,
- Benedikt Soja,
- Xiaoqing Su,
- Daniela Thaller,
- Maik Thomas,
- Guocheng Wang,
- Yuanwei Wu,
- CanCan Xu,
- Xueqing Xu,
- Xinyu Yang,
- Xin Zhao,
- Zhijin Zhou
Affiliations
- Tomasz Kur
- Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics Wrocław Poland
- Justyna Śliwińska‐Bronowicz
- Centrum Badań Kosmicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk Warsaw Poland
- Malgorzata Wińska
- Faculty of Civil Engineering Warsaw University of Technology Warsaw Poland
- Henryk Dobslaw
- Department 1: Geodesy Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam Germany
- Jolanta Nastula
- Centrum Badań Kosmicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk Warsaw Poland
- Aleksander Partyka
- Centrum Badań Kosmicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk Warsaw Poland
- Santiago Belda
- UAVAC University of Alicante Alicante Spain
- Christian Bizouard
- Observatoire de Paris SYRTE Paris France
- Dale Boggs
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
- Sara Bruni
- PosiTim UG at ESA/ESOC Darmstadt Germany
- Lue Chen
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aerospace Flight Dynamic Beijing Aerospace Control Center Beijing China
- Mike Chin
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
- Sujata Dhar
- Department 1: Geodesy Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam Germany
- Robert Dill
- Department 1: Geodesy Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam Germany
- PengShuo Duan
- CAS Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China
- Jose M. Ferrandiz
- UAVAC University of Alicante Alicante Spain
- Junyang Gou
- ETH Zurich Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Zurich Switzerland
- Richard Gross
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
- Sonia Guessoum
- UAVAC University of Alicante Alicante Spain
- Songtao Han
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aerospace Flight Dynamic Beijing Aerospace Control Center Beijing China
- Robert Heinkelmann
- Department 1: Geodesy Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam Germany
- ChengLi Huang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China
- Christopher Irrgang
- Department 1: Geodesy Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam Germany
- Jacek Kudrys
- AGH University of Krakow Krakow Poland
- Jia Li
- Xi'an Surveying and Mapping Center Xi'an China
- Marcin Ligas
- AGH University of Krakow Krakow Poland
- Lintao Liu
- Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan China
- Weitao Lu
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aerospace Flight Dynamic Beijing Aerospace Control Center Beijing China
- Volker Mayer
- LSE Space GmbH at ESA/ESOC Darmstadt Germany
- Wei Miao
- Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China
- Maciej Michalczak
- AGH University of Krakow Krakow Poland
- Sadegh Modiri
- Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy BKG Frankfurt am Main Germany
- Michiel Otten
- PosiTim UG at ESA/ESOC Darmstadt Germany
- Todd Ratcliff
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
- Shrishail Raut
- Department 1: Geodesy Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam Germany
- Jan Saynisch‐Wagner
- Department 1: Geodesy Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam Germany
- Matthias Schartner
- ETH Zurich Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Zurich Switzerland
- Erik Schoenemann
- ESA/ESOC Darmstadt Germany
- Harald Schuh
- Department 1: Geodesy Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam Germany
- M. Kiani Shahvandi
- ETH Zurich Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Zurich Switzerland
- Benedikt Soja
- ETH Zurich Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Zurich Switzerland
- Xiaoqing Su
- Shandong University of Technology Shandong China
- Daniela Thaller
- Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy BKG Frankfurt am Main Germany
- Maik Thomas
- Department 1: Geodesy Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Potsdam Germany
- Guocheng Wang
- Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan China
- Yuanwei Wu
- National Time Service Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shaanxi China
- CanCan Xu
- School of Astronomy and Space Science University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
- Xueqing Xu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China
- Xinyu Yang
- National Time Service Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shaanxi China
- Xin Zhao
- National Time Service Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shaanxi China
- Zhijin Zhou
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aerospace Flight Dynamic Beijing Aerospace Control Center Beijing China
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003278
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 11,
no. 11
pp. n/a – n/a
Abstract
Abstract Growing interest in Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP) resulted in various approaches to the EOP prediction algorithms, as well as in the exploitation of distinct input data, including the observed EOP values from various operational data centers and modeled effective angular momentum functions. Considering these developments and recently emerged new methodologies, the Second Earth Orientation Parameters Prediction Comparison Campaign (2nd EOP PCC) was pursued in 2021–2022. The campaign was led by Centrum Badań Kosmicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk in cooperation with Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum and under the auspices of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service. This paper provides the analysis and evaluation of the polar motion predictions submitted during the 2nd EOP PCC with the prediction horizons between 10 and 30 days. Our analysis shows that predictions are highly reliable with only a few occasional discrepancies identified in the submitted files. We demonstrate the accuracy of EOP predictions by (a) calculating the mean absolute error relative to polar motion observations from September 2021 through December 2022 and (b) assessing the stability of the predictions in time. The analysis shows unequal results for the x and y components of polar motion (PMx and PMy, respectively). Predictions of PMy are usually more accurate and have a smaller spread across all submitted files when compared to PMx. We present an analysis of similarity between the participants to indicate what methods and input data give comparable output. We also prepared the ranking of prediction methods for polar motion summarizing the achievements of the campaign.
Keywords
- Earth orientation parameters
- predictions
- polar motion
- effective angular momentum
- Earth orientation parameters prediction comparison campaign