Comparison of HTO with articular cartilage surgery and UKA in unicompartmental OA

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to assess the clinical outcome of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with articular cartilage surgery compared with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: We designed retrospective study and evaluated 47 patients with unicompartmental OA (Kellgren–Laurence [K–L] grade ≥III OA). Two groups of patients underwent either HTO with articular cartilage surgery or UKA by the senior author between January 2010 and April 2013. The minimum follow-up period is 2 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and visual analog scale (VAS) score. And we evaluated the radiologic result of HTO and UKA by measuring mechanical axis at preoperative period and at last follow-up. Results: The IKDC score was significantly better in the UKA group than in the HTO group at 6 months but there was no significant difference in the two groups at 2 years. The VAS score was improved at the final follow-up compared to before surgery in both groups and did not show significant intergroup difference ( p = 0.123). There was no significant difference in the preoperative mechanical axis in the two groups. But their mechanical axis at the final follow-up were significantly different ( p = 0.0001). Conclusion: The clinical outcome was significantly better in the UKA group at 6 months. But in the two groups, there were no significant differences at 12 months and 2-year follow-up, and the mechanical axis correction effect is greater than the UKA group. Based on our research, HTO with articular cartilage surgery can be considered as the treatment of choice for more active and younger patients with unicompartmental OA.