Revista Brasileira de Entomologia (Jun 2010)
Composição, abundância e riqueza de Calliphoridae (Diptera) das matas e clareiras com diferentes coberturas vegetais da Base de Extração Petrolífera, bacia do Rio Urucu, Coari, Amazonas Composition, abundance and richness of Calliphoridae (Diptera) in the forests and gaps with different forest covers from the oil extraction field located at Urucu River, Coari, Amazonas
Abstract
Este trabalho foi realizado na base de extração petrolífera, bacia do Rio Urucu, Coari, Amazonas, nos meses de abril, junho e outubro de 2007. Um total de 16 áreas foram amostradas, 12 delas de clareiras e quatro de florestas, sendo categorizadas em quatro ambientes (clareiras pouco recuperadas, clareiras semi-recuperadas, clareiras bem recuperadas e floresta preservada). Um total de 7.215 califorídeos foram capturados pertencentes a 16 espécies e uma única delas, a Chloroprocta idioidea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), representou 88,06% deste total. Os padrões de abundância da família não diferiram entre os ambientes, porém eles diferiram para as seguintes espécies: Eumesembrinella randa (Walker, 1849), Hemilucilia semidiaphana (Rondani, 1850) e Paralucilia adespota Dear, 1985. A riqueza estimada variou significativamente entre os ambientes, formando dois grupos: I, clareiras pouco recuperadas (C1) e clareiras semi-recuperadas (C2); e II, clareiras bem recuperadas (C3) e floresta preservada (MT).This research was carried out in the oil extraction field located in Urucu River Basin, Coari, State of Amazonas, Brazil, during the months of April, June and October of 2007. A total of 16 areas were sampled, 12 of them were gaps and four forests, arranged in four environments (gaps litlle-recovered, gaps semi-recovered, gaps well-recovered and preserved forest). A total of 7,215 calliphorid flies was captured belonging to 16 species and only one species, Chloroprocta idioidea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), represented 88.06% of this total. The abundance patterns of the family were not different among the environments, however they were different for the following species: Eumesembrinella randa (Walker, 1849), Hemilucilia semidiaphana (Rondani, 1850) and Paralucilia adespota Dear, 1985 The estimated richness was significantly different between the environments and showed two groups: I, gaps litlle-recovered (C1) and gaps semi-recovered (C2); II, gaps well-recovered (C3) and preserved forest (MT).
Keywords
