EJNMMI Research (Nov 2019)

Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in non-conjunctival origin ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas

  • Hye Lim Park,
  • Joo Hyun O,
  • Sonya Youngju Park,
  • Seung-Eun Jung,
  • Gyeongsin Park,
  • Byung-Ock Choi,
  • Sung Hoon Kim,
  • Young-Woo Jeon,
  • Seok-Goo Cho,
  • Suk-Woo Yang,
  • On behalf of Catholic University Lymphoma Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0562-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Despite the widespread use of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in the diagnosis and response assessment of patients with lymphoma, few studies have assessed its value in ocular adnexal lymphomas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of FDG PET/CT in staging of non-conjunctival origin ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas (OAML). In addition, the diagnostic sensitivity of FDG PET/CT was compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). FDG PET/CT of 123 consecutive patients with pathologically proven OAML between January 2009 and February 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with MALT lymphoma originating from conjunctiva were excluded. A total 50 patients with non-conjunctival origin OAML were assessed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and additional PET parameters were measured for all lesions. Sensitivity for primary tumor detection was compared with MRI. Results Ten patients had bilateral OAML and total 60 OAML lesions were analyzed. MRI was missing in one patient. The tumor locations were as follows: eyelid, 9; lacrimal gland, 18; orbit, 33. Fifty lesions (83.3%) were FDG-avid tumors with mean ± SD SUVmax 4.8 ± 2.4 (range 2.0~11.1). The mean SUVmax according to tumor location were as follows: eyelid, 3.7 ± 1.1 (2.8~5.3); lacrimal gland, 3.6 ± 1.4 (2.1~6.4); orbit, 5.7 ± 2.6 (2.0~11.1). Mean SUVmax among the 3 locations were statistically different (P = 0.010). The sensitivity was calculated as 83.1% (49/59) for FDG PET/CT and 89.8% (53/59) for MRI, which were statistically comparable (P = 0.219 by McNemar’s test). Seven of 50 patients (14%) were upstaged by detection of extraocular lesions by FDG PET/CT (1 kidney and lung, 1 tonsil, 4 cervical LNs, 1 sacral foramen). Conclusion 83.3% of the non-conjunctival origin OAML were FDG-avid tumors, with FDG PET/CT showing comparable sensitivity to that of MRI. FDG PET/CT detected unsuspected extraocular lymphoma involvement in 14% of the patients. FDG PET/CT performed for staging of non-conjunctival origin OAML may thus guide therapeutic management.

Keywords