Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare (Dec 2019)

Strenuous occupational physical activity: Potential association with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk

  • Idrees Ayoub Shah,
  • Gulzar Ahmad Bhat,
  • Rumaisa Rafiq,
  • Najma Nissa,
  • Mansha Muzaffar,
  • Malik Tariq Rasool,
  • Mohd Maqbool Lone,
  • Ghulam Nabi Lone,
  • Paolo Boffetta,
  • Nazir Ahmad Dar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105819860860
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 28

Abstract

Read online

Objective: The impact of recreational physical activity (RPA) on cancer risk has been extensively studied. However, the association of occupational physical activity (OPA), which differs in dose and intensity from RPA, with different cancers including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), has received less attention. Materials and methods: We conducted a hospital-based case–control study in Kashmir, India, majorly a rural population, to evaluate the association of OPA with ESCC risk. Histopathologically confirmed 703 ESCC cases and 1664 controls, individually matched to the respective cases for age, sex and district of residence, were recruited. Main outcome measures: Information on type, duration and intensity of physical activity was obtained in face-to-face interviews with participants using a structured questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Body mass index was unable to be accounted for in the analysis. Results: A high level of OPA was associated with increased ESCC risk (OR = 2.17, 95% CI; 1.41–3.32), compared to subjects with moderate OPA. The association with ESCC risk was stronger in strenuous workers (OR = 3.64, 95% CI; 2.13–6.20). The association of strenuous OPA with ESCC risk persisted only in subjects that were involved in strenuous activities for equal to or greater than five days/week. Conclusions: Our study suggests a possible association of strenuous OPA with ESCC risk. Although our results were adjusted for multiple factors, including indicators of socioeconomic status, more replicative occupational epidemiological studies are needed to rule out any residual confounding.