Zhongguo quanke yixue (Nov 2022)

Comparison of the Brief CSI-D and MMSE Scales in Screening for Dementia in Middle-aged and Elderly Chinese People

  • WEI Xiaxia, HAO Zhimei, CHEN Ling, WANG Fenglan, JING Liwei, XING Fengmei

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0272
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 31
pp. 3866 – 3871

Abstract

Read online

Background The number of dementia patients is increasing along with the aging of the population. Dementia greatly impairs health and quality of life of patients, so early prevention and identification are particularly important. Objective To compare the results of the brief Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI-D) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in dementia screening, and to assess the examination consistency of the two scales. Methods In November 2021, we collected data of a sample of 2 668 middle-aged and elderly people with complete data (including assessment results of CSI-D and MMSE, sex, age, place of residence, education level and marital status) of the CHARLS 2018. The brief CSI-D and MMSE were used to screen the risk of dementia. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation of the scores of the brief CSI-D with those of MMSE. The consistencies of the two scales in the screening of dementia in all cases and subgroups divided by personal characteristics were calculated, the overall consistency was assessed using Kappa statistic. Results The average CSI-D score and average MMSE score for all participants were (5.84±2.26) and (24.93±3.24) , respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the brief CSI-D score was positively correlated with the MMSE score (r=0.394, P<0.001) . The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.36% (730/2 668) screened by the brief CSI-D, and was 22.11% (590/2 668) by the MMSE, showing statistically significant difference (χ2=40.167, P<0.001) . The consistency of the two scales in screening dementia in all cases was 20.22%, and ranged from 12.50% to 30.43% in screening dementia in subgroups divided by personal characteristics. Kappa statistic showed that the kappa value between the two scales was 0.121 (P<0.001) , suggesting a weak level of consistency. Conclusion In general, there are differences and weak consistency in the screening results of dementia between CSI-D and MMSE in general household population. Therefore, the use of the scales should be analyzed according to the actual situation. The in-depth comparison and discussion on the screening accuracy of the two scales could be further performed in combination with the gold standard for diagnosing dementia.

Keywords