Journal of Clinical Medicine (May 2024)

Moderate-Intensity Constant and High-Intensity Interval Training Confer Differential Metabolic Benefits in Skeletal Muscle, White Adipose Tissue, and Liver of Candidates to Undergo Bariatric Surgery

  • Matías Ruíz-Uribe,
  • Javier Enríquez-Schmidt,
  • Manuel Monrroy-Uarac,
  • Camila Mautner-Molina,
  • Mariana Kalazich-Rosales,
  • Maximiliano Muñoz,
  • Francisca Fuentes-Leal,
  • Carlos Cárcamo-Ibaceta,
  • Daniel J. Fazakerley,
  • Mark Larance,
  • Pamela Ehrenfeld,
  • Sergio Martínez-Huenchullán

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113273
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 11
p. 3273

Abstract

Read online

Background/Objectives: Bariatric surgery candidates require presurgical physical training, therefore, we compared the metabolic effects of a constant moderate-intensity training program (MICT) vs. a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in this population. Methods: Seventeen participants performed MICT (n = 9, intensity of 50% of heart rate reserve (HRR) and/or 4–5/10 subjective sensation of effort (SSE)) or HIIT (n = 8, 6 cycles of 2.5 min at 80% of the HRR and/or 7–8/10 of SSE, interspersed by 6 cycles of active rest at 20% of the FCR) for 10 sessions for 4 weeks. After training, tissue samples (skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and liver) were extracted, and protein levels of adiponectin, GLUT4, PGC1α, phospho-AMPK/AMPK, collagen 1 and TGFβ1 were measured. Results: Participants who performed MICT showed higher protein levels of PGC-1α in skeletal muscle samples (1.1 ± 0.27 vs. 0.7 ± 0.4-fold change, p p p Conclusions: Our results show that both MICT and HIIT confer metabolic benefits in candidates undergoing bariatric surgery; however, most of these benefits have a program-specific fashion. Future studies should aim to elucidate the mechanisms behind these differences.

Keywords