Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics (Apr 2024)

Intraoperative reliability of the tibial anteroposterior axis “Akagi's Line” in total knee arthroplasty

  • Kohei Kawaguchi,
  • Ryota Yamagami,
  • Kono Kenichi,
  • Tomofumi Kage,
  • Ryo Murakami,
  • Takahiro Arakawa,
  • Hiroshi Inui,
  • Shuji Taketomi,
  • Sakae Tanaka

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.12020
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose The tibial anatomical anteroposterior (AP) axis “Akagi's line” was originally defined on computed tomography (CT) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, its intraoperative reproducibility remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the intraoperative reproducibility of the Akagi's line and its effect on postoperative clinical outcomes. Methods This prospective study included 171 TKAs. The rotational angle of the intraoperative Akagi's line relative to the original Akagi's line (RAA) defined on CT was measured. The RAA was calculated based on the tibial component rotational angles relative to the intraoperative Akagi's line measured using the navigation system and CT. The effects of RAA on postoperative clinical outcomes and rotational alignments of components were also evaluated. Results The mean absolute RAA (standard deviation) value was 5.5° (3.9°). The range of RAA was 22° internal rotation to 16° external rotation. Intraoperative Akagi's line outliers (RAA > 10°) were observed in 14% of the knees (24 knees). In outlier analysis, the tibial component rotation angle was externally rotated 6.5° (5.6°) in the outlier group and externally rotated 3.7° (4.2°) in the nonoutlier group (≤10°), with a significant difference between the two groups. Additionally, the outlier group (RAA > 10°) showed lower postoperative clinical outcomes. Conclusion The original Akagi's line defined on CT showed insufficient reproducibility intraoperatively. The poor intraoperative detection of Akagi's line could be the reason for the tibial component rotational error and worse postoperative clinical outcomes. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series.

Keywords