Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Jul 2007)

Evaluation of ECMWF ERA-40 temperature and wind in the lower tropical stratosphere since 1988 from past long-duration balloon measurements

  • T. Christensen,
  • B. M. Knudsen,
  • J.-P. Pommereau,
  • G. Letrenne,
  • A. Hertzog,
  • F. Vial,
  • J. Ovarlez,
  • M. Piot

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 13
pp. 3399 – 3409

Abstract

Read online

The temperature and wind of the ECMWF ERA-40 reanalysis in the tropical lower stratosphere during the period 1988&ndash;2001 has been evaluated by comparison with independent in situ measurements of 21 IR Montgolfier and superpressure long-duration balloon flights performed by CNES from Pretoria (26&deg; S) in South Africa in 1988&ndash;1989, Latacunga (1&deg; S) in Ecuador in 1991&ndash;1998 and Bauru (22&deg; S) in Brazil in 2000&ndash;2001. The ERA-40 temperature displays a bias varying progressively from +1.16 K in 1988&ndash;1989, to +0.26 K in 1994&ndash;1996 and &minus;0.46 K after 1998, the latter being fully consistent with recent evaluations of ECMWF operational analysis from radio occultation and in situ long-duration balloon observations. The amplitude of the bias and its evolution are very similar to the results of a previous evaluation from radiosondes in 1991&ndash;2003, suggesting that the origin of the drift of ERA-40 might be mainly due to errors in the series of satellite measurements of MSU, replaced by AMSU in 1998, assimilated in the model. <br><br> The ERA-40 zonal wind speed in the lower stratosphere appears slightly overestimated by 0.7&ndash;1.0 m/s on average in both the tropics and equatorial region, that is by 5&ndash;10% compared to the average 10&ndash;20 m/s wind speed. This bias, fully consistent with a recent evaluation of ECMWF operational analysis in 2004, is found constant during the whole 1988&ndash;2001 period, suggesting a shortfall in the variabililty of ERA-40 horizontal winds in the lower stratosphere in the tropics and the equatorial region. Finally calculated trajectories using ERA-40, frequently used for analysing field observations, are found in error compared to that of the balloons by &plusmn;500 km after 5 days and &plusmn;1000 km after 10 days.